Literature DB >> 17069168

Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.

Periklis Proussaefs1, Jaime Lozada.   

Abstract

The use of titanium mesh for localized alveolar ridge augmentation was evaluated by clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. Seventeen patients participated in this study. All patients required localized alveolar ridge augmentation before placement of dental implants. An equal mixture of autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine mineral (Bio-Oss) was used as a bone graft material. Autogenous bone graft was harvested intraorally. Titanium mesh was submerged for 8.47 months (SD 2.83). Impressions were taken intraorally before bone grafting, 6 months after bone grafting, and 6 months after implant placement. Impressions were used to measure the volume of alveolar ridge augmentation and provide linear laboratory measurements regarding the results of bone augmentation. Bone quality (type II-IV) was recorded during implant surgery. Standardized linear tomographs were taken before bone grafting and before implant placement. A biopsy was harvested with a trephine bur from the grafted area during implant surgery for histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. In all cases the grafted area had adequate bone volume and consistency for placement of dental implants. Early mesh exposure (2 weeks) was observed in 2 patients, and late exposure (>3 months) was observed in 4 patients. Volumetric laboratory measurements indicated 0.86 cc (SD 0.69) alveolar augmentation 1 month after bone grafting, 0.73 cc (SD 0.60) 6 months after bone grafting, and 0.71 cc (SD 0.57) 6 months after implant placement. This indicated 15.11% resorption 6 months after bone grafting, and no further resorption occurred after implant placement. Linear laboratory measurements indicated vertical augmentation of 2.94 mm (SD 0.86) 1 month after bone grafting, 2.59 mm (SD 0.91) 6 months after bone grafting, and 2.65 mm (SD 1.14) 6 months after implant placement. The corresponding measurements for labial-buccal augmentation were 4.47 mm (SD 1.55), 3.88 mm (SD 1.43), and 3.82 mm (SD 1.47). Radiographic evaluation indicated 2.56 mm (SD 1.32) vertical augmentation and 3.75 mm (SD 1.33) labial-buccal augmentation. Histomorphometric evaluation indicated 36.47% (SD 10.05) new bone formation, 49.18% (SD 6.92) connective tissue, and 14.35% (SD 5.85) residual Bio-Oss particles; 44.65% (SD 22.58) of the Bio-Oss surface was in tight contact with newly formed bone. The use of titanium mesh for localized alveolar ridge augmentation with a mixture of autogenous intraorally harvested bone graft and Bio-Oss offered adequate bone volume for placement of dental implants. Intraorally harvested autogenous bone graft mixed with Bio-Oss under a titanium mesh offered 36.47% new bone formation, and 15.11% resorption occurred 6 months after bone grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069168     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  23 in total

1.  Predictability of staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh.

Authors:  Shinobu Uehara; Hiroshi Kurita; Tetsu Shimane; Hironori Sakai; Takahiro Kamata; Yuji Teramoto; Shinichi Yamada
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-20

Review 2.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

Review 3.  Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: A review.

Authors:  Dipti Daga; Divya Mehrotra; Shadab Mohammad; Geeta Singh; S M Natu
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04-03

4.  The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Jung-Seok Lee; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Preliminary evaluation of a three-dimensional, customized, and preformed titanium mesh in peri-implant alveolar bone regeneration.

Authors:  Gyu-Un Jung; Jae-Yun Jeon; Kyung-Gyun Hwang; Chang-Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

6.  Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Height Gained by Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Titanium Mesh and Novabone Putty in Posterior Mandible.

Authors:  Rahul Malik; Ashish Gupta; Pankaj Bansal; Rahul Sharma; Sneha Sharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-05-31

7.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: Clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study.

Authors:  Jihad Khamees; Mohammad Atef Darwiche; Nabil Kochaji
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

8.  Accidental identification of accessory mental nerve and foramen during implant surgery.

Authors:  Sudhindra Kulkarni; Sampath Kumar; Sujata Kamath; Srinath Thakur
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco Rasia-dal Polo; Pier-Paolo Poli; Davide Rancitelli; Mario Beretta; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-11-01

10.  Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior maxilla using autograft, xenograft and titanium mesh with simultaneous placement of endosseous implants.

Authors:  Sudhendra Deshpande; Jeevanand Deshmukh; Sumeet Deshpande; Richa Khatri; Shubha Deshpande
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.