Literature DB >> 17068368

Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.

N Jamal1, K-H Ng, L-M Looi, D McLean, A Zulfiqar, S-P Tan, W-F Liew, A Shantini, S Ranganathan.   

Abstract

We describe a semi-automated technique for the quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms in comparison with patterns suggested by Tabar. It was developed using the MATLAB-based graphical user interface applications. It is based on an interactive thresholding method, after a short automated method that shows the fibroglandular tissue area, breast area and breast density each time new thresholds are placed on the image. The breast density is taken as a percentage of the fibroglandular tissue to the breast tissue areas. It was tested in four different ways, namely by examining: (i) correlation of the quantitative assessment results with subjective classification, (ii) classification performance using the quantitative assessment technique, (iii) interobserver agreement and (iv) intraobserver agreement. The results of the quantitative assessment correlated well (r2 = 0.92) with the subjective Tabar patterns classified by the radiologist (correctly classified 83% of digitized mammograms). The average kappa coefficient for the agreement between the readers was 0.63. This indicated moderate agreement between the three observers in classifying breast density using the quantitative assessment technique. The kappa coefficient of 0.75 for intraobserver agreement reflected good agreement between two sets of readings. The technique may be useful as a supplement to the radiologist's assessment in classifying mammograms into Tabar's pattern associated with breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068368     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of mammographic breast composition measurements: towards a quantitative measure of relative breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Gut microbiome, body weight, and mammographic breast density in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Volker Mai; Xuefeng Wang; Maria Ukhanova; Maximiliano Tagliamonte; Yessica C Martinez; Shannan N Rich; Kathleen M Egan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.

Authors:  Macarena Garrido-Estepa; Francisco Ruiz-Perales; Josefa Miranda; Nieves Ascunce; Isabel González-Román; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María P Moreno; Jose A Váquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado-García; Francisco Casanova; María Ederra; Dolores Salas; Marina Pollán
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Textural classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns with the SONNET Selforganizing neural network.

Authors:  Daniel Howard; Simon C Roberts; Conor Ryan; Adrian Brezulianu
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Gultekin Gulsen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.