Literature DB >> 17067720

A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.

Meredith Borland1, Ian Jacobs, Barbara King, Debra O'Brien.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We compare the efficacy of intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in a pediatric population presenting to an emergency department (ED) with acute long-bone fractures.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in a tertiary pediatric ED between September 2001 and January 2005. A convenience sample of children aged 7 to 15 years with clinically deformed closed long-bone fractures was included to receive either active intravenous morphine (10 mg/mL) and intranasal placebo or active intranasal concentrated fentanyl (150 microg/mL) and intravenous placebo. Exclusion criteria were narcotic analgesia within 4 hours of arrival, significant head injury, allergy to opiates, nasal blockage, or inability to perform pain scoring. Pain scores were rated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. Routine clinical observations and adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven children were enrolled (mean age 10.9 years [SD 2.4]). Fractures were radius or ulna 53 (79.1%), humerus 9 (13.4%), tibia or fibula 4 (6.0%), and femur 1 (1.5%). Thirty-four children received intravenous (i.v.) morphine and 33 received intranasal fentanyl. Statistically significant differences in visual analog scale scores were not observed between the 2 treatment arms either preanalgesia or at 5, 10, 20, or 30 minutes postanalgesia (P=.333). At 10 minutes, the difference in mean visual analog scale between the morphine and fentanyl groups was -5 mm (95% confidence interval -16 to 7 mm). Reductions in combined pain scores occurred at 5 minutes (20 mm; P=.000), 10 minutes (4 mm; P=.012), and 20 minutes (8 mm; P=.000) postanalgesia. The mean total INF dose was 1.7 microg/kg, and the mean total i.v. morphine dose was 0.11 mg/kg. There were no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Intranasal fentanyl delivered as 150 microg/mL at a dose of 1.7 microg/kg was shown to be an effective analgesic in children aged 7 to 15 years presenting to an ED with an acute fracture when compared to intravenous morphine at 0.1 mg/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17067720     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  38 in total

1.  Treating and Reducing Anxiety and Pain in the Paediatric Emergency Department: The TRAPPED survey.

Authors:  Evelyne D Trottier; Samina Ali; Sylvie Le May; Jocelyn Gravel
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 2.  [Burns and scalds in children].

Authors:  B Landsleitner; J Keil
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Correction to: Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Victoria C Ziesenitz; Janelle D Vaughns; Gilbert Koch; Gerd Mikus; Johannes N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  [Nalbuphine in pediatric anesthesia].

Authors:  A-M Schultz-Machata; K Becke; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  An open-label randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of adding intranasal fentanyl to intravenous tramadol in patients with moderate to severe pain following acute musculoskeletal injuries.

Authors:  Keng Sheng Chew; Abdul Hafiz Shaharudin
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 6.  Analgesia in Patients with Trauma in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  David Häske; Bernd W Böttiger; Bertil Bouillon; Matthias Fischer; Gernot Gaier; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Matthias Helm; Peter Hilbert-Carius; Björn Hossfeld; Christoph Meisner; Benjamin Schempf; Arasch Wafaisade; Michael Bernhard
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  A randomized clinical trial comparing oral, aerosolized intranasal, and aerosolized buccal midazolam.

Authors:  Eileen J Klein; Julie C Brown; Ana Kobayashi; Daniel Osincup; Kristy Seidel
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Victoria C Ziesenitz; Janelle D Vaughns; Gilbert Koch; Gerd Mikus; Johannes N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  [Pediatric perioperative systemic pain therapy: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; G Grögl; W Stromer; W Jaksch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 10.  Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children.

Authors:  Adrian Murphy; Ronan O'Sullivan; Abel Wakai; Timothy S Grant; Michael J Barrett; John Cronin; Siobhan C McCoy; Jeffrey Hom; Nandini Kandamany
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.