Su Young Lee1, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau. 1. Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome. METHODS: Cefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT>MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fC(min)/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures. RESULTS: Eradication was 80% when fT>MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T>MIC was less than 50% (p<0.05). The median fC(min)/MIC ratio for ESBL group was statistically lower than that for the non-ESBL group (1.54 versus 138, p<0.001). Regardless of ESBL production, all pathogens were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC>7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC< or =7.6 (p<0.05). Pharmacodynamic exposures of 50% fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC>1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2g q 12h and q 8h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4 g continuous infusion and 2g q 6-8h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2 microg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC=7.6. CONCLUSION: Microbiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome. METHODS:Cefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT>MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fC(min)/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures. RESULTS: Eradication was 80% when fT>MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T>MIC was less than 50% (p<0.05). The median fC(min)/MIC ratio for ESBL group was statistically lower than that for the non-ESBL group (1.54 versus 138, p<0.001). Regardless of ESBL production, all pathogens were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC>7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC< or =7.6 (p<0.05). Pharmacodynamic exposures of 50% fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC>1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2g q 12h and q 8h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4 g continuous infusion and 2g q 6-8h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2 microg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC=7.6. CONCLUSION: Microbiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure.
Authors: Thomas M Chapuis; Eric Giannoni; Paul A Majcherczyk; René Chioléro; Marie-Denise Schaller; Mette M Berger; Saskia Bolay; Laurent A Décosterd; Denis Bugnon; Philippe Moreillon Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nathaniel J Rhodes; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau; Scott Van Wart; Anthony M Nicasio; Jiajun Liu; Benjamin J Lee; Michael N Neely; Marc H Scheetz Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 5.191