Literature DB >> 17067665

How healthy are clones and their progeny: 5 years of field experience.

M Panarace1, J I Agüero, M Garrote, G Jauregui, A Segovia, L Cané, J Gutiérrez, M Marfil, F Rigali, M Pugliese, S Young, J Lagioia, C Garnil, J E Forte Pontes, J C Ereno Junio, S Mower, M Medina.   

Abstract

There is considerable concern regarding the health of cloned cattle and their safety as a source of food. The objective was to summarize 5 years of commercial experience with cloning in three countries (United States, Argentina and Brazil). Overall, only 9% of transferred embryos resulted in calves; efficiency ranged from 0 to 45% (most were from 1 to 10%, but 24% of cell lines never produced live calves). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate following transfer of one versus two embryos. Before 90 days of gestation, two ultrasound markers for embryo death were found, either crown rump length (CRL) or heart beat less than 7.5mm and 150bpm, respectively, were observed alone or together in 27% of clones that died. In addition, after 100 days of pregnancy, placental edema, hydrops fetalis and increased abdominal circumference size were used as ultrasound findings of a fetus at risk of loss. At 114 days of gestation, abdominal circumference in clones that died was statistically larger than in clones that survived alive to term and from MOET- and IVF-derived pregnancies (P<0.05). Since elective cesarean section (C-section) was partially replaced by natural or assisted parturition, C-section rates decreased from 100% in 2000 to 54% in 2005. On average, 42% of cloned calves died between delivery and 150 days of life; the most common abnormalities were: enlarged umbilical cord (37%), respiratory problems (19%), calves depressed/prolonged recumbency (20%) and contracted flexor tendons (21%). From 11 blood parameters evaluated during the first week of life, lactate decreased twice and glucose doubled its original value from 24h to 7 days. Adult cloned females had normal breeding and calving rates and cloned bulls produced good quality semen and had normal fertility when used for AI or natural mating. In conclusion, cloning had no risks qualitatively different from those encountered in animals involved in modern agricultural practices, although the frequency of the risks appeared to be increased in cattle during the early portions of the life cycle of cattle clones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17067665     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  17 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic bovine as bioreactors: Challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Paulo S Monzani; Paulo R Adona; Otávio M Ohashi; Flávio V Meirelles; Matthew B Wheeler
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.269

2.  Loss of methylation at H19 DMD is associated with biallelic expression and reduced development in cattle derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  J Suzuki; J Therrien; F Filion; R Lefebvre; A K Goff; F Perecin; F V Meirelles; L C Smith
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Finding the niche for human somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Uta Grieshammer; Kelly A Shepard; Elizabeth A Nigh; Alan Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  A comparative study on efficiency of adult fibroblasts and amniotic fluid-derived stem cells as donor cells for production of hand-made cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.

Authors:  Sadeesh Em; Meena Kataria; Fozia Shah; P S Yadav
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Germ-line transmission of lentiviral PGK-EGFP integrants in transgenic cattle: new perspectives for experimental embryology.

Authors:  Myriam Reichenbach; Tiongti Lim; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Tuna Guengoer; Felix A Habermann; Marieke Matthiesen; Andreas Hofmann; Frank Weber; Holm Zerbe; Thomas Grupp; Fred Sinowatz; Alexander Pfeifer; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos.

Authors:  Stefan Bauersachs; Susanne E Ulbrich; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Megan Minten; Myriam Reichenbach; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Helmut Blum; Thomas E Spencer; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines at the fetal-maternal interface in bovine pregnancies produced by cloning.

Authors:  Heloisa M Rutigliano; Aaron J Thomas; Janae J Umbaugh; Amanda Wilhelm; Benjamin R Sessions; Rakesh Kaundal; Naveen Duhan; Brady A Hicks; Donald H Schlafer; Kenneth L White; Christopher J Davies
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.777

8.  Longitudinal study of reproductive performance of female cattle produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Irina A Polejaeva; Diane M Broek; Shawn C Walker; Wenli Zhou; Mark Walton; Abby D Benninghoff; David C Faber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vascular alterations underlie developmental problems manifested in cloned cattle before or after birth.

Authors:  Paulo Cesar Maiorka; Phelipe Oliveira Favaron; Andrea Maria Mess; Caio Rodrigues dos Santos; Miryan Lanca Alberto; Flavio Vieira Meirelles; Maria Angelica Miglino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Establishment of Trophectoderm Cell Lines from Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos of Different Sources and Examination of In Vitro Developmental Competence, Quality, Epigenetic Status and Gene Expression in Cloned Embryos Derived from Them.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Karn Pratap Singh; Suresh Kumar Singla; Manmohan Singh Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.