Literature DB >> 17066640

Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.

Michael R Norton1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure marginal bone loss from the implant-abutment microgap to the bone crest between multiple freestanding implants functionally loaded for up to 7.5 years in the posterior jaws.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients consecutively treated for the replacement of missing posterior teeth were included in the study. Using the implant-abutment interface, which was placed level with the crestal bone as a reference point, standardized follow-up radiographs were obtained to evaluate marginal bone loss. Results were subject to statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test at the 95% confidence level. Additionally, soft tissue and prosthetic complications were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three implants in 54 patients were evaluated. Implants were in function for a mean of 37 months (range, 21 to 91 months). One implant failed, for a survival rate of 99.4%. Overall mean marginal bone loss was 0.65 mm (range, 0.0 to 4.8 mm). For the 80 maxillary and 93 mandibular implants, mean marginal bone loss was 0.56 mm and 0.70 mm, respectively. The frequency of bone loss > or = 1.0 mm was 25.0% in the maxilla and 36.0% in the mandible; 23.1% of maxillary implants and 16.7% of mandibular implants demonstrated no bone loss. No significant differences were observed between men and women or between smokers and nonsmokers. The difference between mesial and distal bone levels was statistically significant (P < .001), with respective means of 0.53 mm and 0.76 mm. Recorded prosthetic complications included cementation failure (17.7%), porcelain fracture (7.2%), and abutment screw loosening (2.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple single-tooth implants placed in the posterior jaws perform extremely well. Furthermore, it is possible to retain bone close to the implant-abutment microgap with certain implant designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17066640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Use of separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study for up to 1 year.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kwon; In-Sung Yeo; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sara Hussain Alhammadi; Girvan Burnside; Alexander Milosevic
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Odontuya Dorj; Chin-Kai Lin; Eisner Salamanca; Yu-Hwa Pan; Yi-Fan Wu; Yung-Szu Hsu; Jerry C-Y Lin; Hsi-Kuei Lin; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Importance of a distal proximal contact on load transfer by implant-supported single adjacent crowns in posterior region of the mandible: a photoelastic study.

Authors:  Fábio Afrânio de Aguiar Júnior; Rodrigo Tiossi; Ana Paula Macedo; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Short-term improvement of masticatory function after implant restoration.

Authors:  Si-Mook Kang; Sang-Soo Lee; Ho-Keun Kwon; Baek-Il Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Does Oral Implant Design Affect Marginal Bone Loss? Results of a Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.

Authors:  Benedikt C Spies; Maria Bateli; Ghada Ben Rahal; Marin Christmann; Kirstin Vach; Ralf-Joachim Kohal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.