Literature DB >> 17066305

Predator avoidance behavior in the pea aphid: costs, frequency, and population consequences.

Erik H Nelson1.   

Abstract

Induced prey defenses can be costly. These costs have the potential to reduce prey survival or reproduction and, therefore, prey population growth. I estimated the potential for predators to suppress populations of pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) in alfalfa fields through the induction of pea aphid predator avoidance behavior. I quantified (1) the period of non-feeding activity that follows a disturbance event, (2) the effect of frequent disturbance on aphid reproduction, and (3) the frequency at which aphids are disturbed by predators. In combination, these three values predict that the disturbances induced by predators can substantially reduce aphid population growth. This result stems from the high frequency of predator-induced disturbance, and the observation that even brief disturbances reduce aphid reproduction. The potential for predators to suppress prey populations through induction of prey defenses may be strongest in systems where (1) predators frequently induce prey defensive responses, and (2) prey defenses incur acute survival or reproductive costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17066305     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0573-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Effects of time limitation and egg limitation on lifetime reproductive success of a parasitoid in the field.

Authors:  G E Heimpel; M Mangel; J A Rosenheim
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The economics of escape behaviour in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors:  Lawrence M Dill; Alex H G Fraser; Bernard D Roitberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Implications of predator foraging on aphid pathogen dynamics.

Authors:  H E Roy; J K Pell; S J Clark; P G Alderson
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.841

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Symbiont infection affects aphid defensive behaviours.

Authors:  Emilie Dion; Sarah Erika Polin; Jean-Christophe Simon; Yannick Outreman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Many ways to land upright: novel righting strategies allow spotted lanternfly nymphs to land on diverse substrates.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Theodore Bien; Luis Contreras-Orendain; Michael F Ochs; S Tonia Hsieh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  A positive trait-mediated indirect effect involving the natural enemies of competing herbivores.

Authors:  F J Frank van Veen; Callum E Brandon; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Young aphids avoid erroneous dropping when evading mammalian herbivores by combining input from two sensory modalities.

Authors:  Moshe Gish; Amots Dafni; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dropping Behavior in the Pea Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae): How Does Environmental Context Affect Antipredator Responses?

Authors:  Katharine V Harrison; Evan L Preisser
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Fear of predation alters clone-specific performance in phloem-feeding prey.

Authors:  Mouhammad Shadi Khudr; Oksana Y Buzhdygan; Jana S Petermann; Susanne Wurst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Consumptive and nonconsumptive effect ratios depend on interaction between plant quality and hunting behavior of omnivorous predators.

Authors:  Jörg G Stephan; Johan A Stenberg; Christer Björkman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Multi-species suppression of herbivores through consumptive and non-consumptive effects.

Authors:  Kathryn S Ingerslew; Deborah L Finke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predation determines different selective pressure on pea aphid host races in a complex agricultural mosaic.

Authors:  Adalbert Balog; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dropping behaviour of pea aphid nymphs increases their development time and reduces their reproductive capacity as adults.

Authors:  Barbara Agabiti; Roxanne J Wassenaar; Linton Winder
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.