Literature DB >> 17066291

[Primary stability of the capsule-labrum complex after reconstruction with the Mitek Bioknotless anchor system in human cadaver models].

E Erdeljac1, E Steinhauser, U Schreiber, A B Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the postoperative stability of the Mitek Bioknotless anchor system with biomechanical draw-out pulling in human cadaver shoulders.
METHOD: With simulation of anterior shoulder dislocation a test group (n=10, Ø 45 years) was tested against a native group (n=8, Ø 47 years). All shoulders were dissected up to the passive stabilizers. In the test group an artificial Bankart lesion was created and repaired with three Mitek Bioknotless anchors. The humeri of both groups were fixed in 60 degrees glenohumeral abduction and 90 degrees external rotation and then dislocated in a ventral direction. For evaluation purposes the ultimate draw-out strength, mode of failure, translation of humeral head, capsular slope, and bone density in the test group were measured.
RESULTS: In the test group the ultimate strength was a median of 937 N (min. 554 N, max. 1,294 N) with 28 bony anchor dislocations, 1 suture rupture, and 1 capsular rupture, and in the native group with 6 Bankart and 2 HAGL lesions it was 1,214 N (708 N, 1,471 N). The bone density showed a positive correlation to the draw-out strength regarding cortical density and total density.
CONCLUSION: Regarding the high draw-out strength the Mitek Bioknotless anchor system provides enough stability for early functional treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17066291     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1191-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  12 in total

1.  Fatigue testing of suture anchors.

Authors:  Stefan Rupp; Thomas Georg; Christian Gauss; Dieter Kohn; Romain Seil
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  [Surgical therapy of traumatic shoulder dislocation. Are there evidence-based indications for arthroscopic Bankart operation?].

Authors:  M Tingart; H Bäthis; B Bouillon; E Neugebauer; T Tiling
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  In vitro comparison of standard and Knotless metal suture anchors.

Authors:  Matthias Zumstein; Hilaire A C Jacob; Alberto G Schneeberger
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions.

Authors:  Michael B Mueller; Helmut H Fredrich; Erwin Steinhauser; Ulrich Schreiber; Achim Arians; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  [Arthroscopic capsule-labrum refixation in anterior shoulder dislocation. Primary or secondary management?].

Authors:  G Hehl; E Lang; I Hoellen; H Kiefer; U Becker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Biomechanical performance of Bankart repairs in a human cadaveric shoulder model.

Authors:  K D Mohammed; D H Sonnabend; J A Goldberg; S Hutabarat; P Walker; W R Walsh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design.

Authors:  P Boileau; G Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-09

8.  Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.

Authors:  Brent P Leedle; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  [Passive stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  N Wülker; C Sperveslage; F Brewe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Suture anchor failure strength--an in vivo study.

Authors:  F A Barber; P Cawley; J F Prudich
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.