Literature DB >> 17066118

Therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks in managing chronic neck pain: a preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: clinical trial NCT0033272.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti1, Kim Damron, Kim Cash, Rajeev Manchukonda, Vidyasagar Pampati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on the criteria established by the International Association for the Study of Pain, the prevalence of persistent neck pain, secondary to involvement of cervical facet or zygapophysial joints has been described in controlled studies as varying from 54% to 67%. Intraarticular injections, medial branch nerve blocks and neurolysis of medial branch nerves have been described in managing chronic neck pain of facet joint origin.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks in managing chronic neck pain of facet joint origin and to evaluate the effectiveness of the addition of Sarapin and steroids to local anesthetics.
DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: An interventional pain management setting in the United States.
METHODS: In this preliminary analysis, data from a total of 60 patients were included, with 15 patients in each of the 4 groups. Thirty patients were in a non-steroid group (combined Group I and II); and 30 patients were in a steroid group (combined Group III and IV). All of the patients met the diagnostic criteria of cervical facet joint pain by means of comparative, controlled diagnostic blocks. Four types of interventions were included. Group I served as control, receiving medial branch blocks using bupivacaine. Group II consisted of cervical medial branch blocks with bupivacaine and Sarapin. Group III consisted of cervical medial branch blocks with bupivacaine and betamethasone. Group IV consisted of cervical medial branch blocks with bupivacaine, Sarapin and betamethasone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Numeric pain scores, Neck Pain Disability Index, opioid intake, and work status were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
RESULTS: Significant pain relief (> or =50%), and functional status improvement was observed at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The average number of treatments for 1 year was 3.8 +/- 0.7 in the non-steroid group and 3.4 +/- 1.0 in the steroid group with no significant difference among the groups. Duration of average pain relief with each procedure was 13.4 +/- 3.5 weeks in the nonsteroid group, and it was 15.9 +/- 8.0 weeks in the steroid group with no significant difference among the groups.
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic cervical medial branch nerve blocks, with or without Sarapin or steroids, may provide effective management for chronic neck pain of facet joint origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17066118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

1.  Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block for the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ki Deok Park; Dong-Ju Lim; Woo Yong Lee; JaeKi Ahn; Yongbum Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Transforaminal injection of corticosteroids for lumbar radiculopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nasir A Quraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 5.  A Review of the Clinical Utility of Therapeutic Facet Joint Injections in Whiplash Associated Cervical Spinal Pain.

Authors:  Kelechi Eseonu; Jaykar Panchmatia; David Pang; Bahram Fakouri
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Physician-delivered injection therapies for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review update (non-oral, non-intravenous pharmacological interventions for neck pain).

Authors:  Anita R Gross; Paul M Peloso; Erin Galway; Neenah Navasero; Karis Van Essen; Nadine Graham; Charlie H Goldsmith; Wisam Gzeer; Qiyun Shi; Ted And Cog Haines
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20

7.  Pharmacological Interventions Including Medical Injections for Neck Pain: An Overview as Part of the ICON Project.

Authors:  Paul M Peloso; Mahweesh Khan; Anita R Gross; Lisa Carlesso; Lina Santaguida; Janet Lowcock; Joy C Macdermid; Dave Walton; Charlie H Goldsmith; Pierre Langevin; Qiyun Shi
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.