OBJECTIVE: While high parity is hypothesized to be associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, few studies have examined this association in diverse racial samples or geographical areas. Our objectives were to estimate the magnitude of association between parity and diabetes and to determine if higher parity is predictive of future risk of diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based, prospective cohort study of 7,024 Caucasian and African-American women from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, a prospective epidemiological study of men and women aged 45-64 years, with 9 years of follow-up. Incident diabetes was defined by the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Parity was defined as the number of live births (no live births [nulliparity], one to two live births, three to four live births, and five or more live births [grandmultiparity]). Parity and risk of diabetes was estimated for 754 incident cases of diabetes with Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Incidence rates were highest among women with five or more live births (23/1,000 person-years [95% CI 20.3-26.7]) and lowest among women with one to two live births (11/1,000 person-years [9.6-12.5]). Adjustment indicated that much of the risk was due to sociodemographic factors and higher obesity, but after adjustment for all covariates, grandmultiparity (five or more) was still associated with a 27% increased risk for diabetes (hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 1.02-1.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Grandmultiparity is predictive of future risk of diabetes after adjustment for confounders.
OBJECTIVE: While high parity is hypothesized to be associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, few studies have examined this association in diverse racial samples or geographical areas. Our objectives were to estimate the magnitude of association between parity and diabetes and to determine if higher parity is predictive of future risk of diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based, prospective cohort study of 7,024 Caucasian and African-American women from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, a prospective epidemiological study of men and women aged 45-64 years, with 9 years of follow-up. Incident diabetes was defined by the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Parity was defined as the number of live births (no live births [nulliparity], one to two live births, three to four live births, and five or more live births [grandmultiparity]). Parity and risk of diabetes was estimated for 754 incident cases of diabetes with Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Incidence rates were highest among women with five or more live births (23/1,000 person-years [95% CI 20.3-26.7]) and lowest among women with one to two live births (11/1,000 person-years [9.6-12.5]). Adjustment indicated that much of the risk was due to sociodemographic factors and higher obesity, but after adjustment for all covariates, grandmultiparity (five or more) was still associated with a 27% increased risk for diabetes (hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 1.02-1.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Grandmultiparity is predictive of future risk of diabetes after adjustment for confounders.
Authors: Nisha I Parikh; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Hongyan Ning; Pamela Ouyang; Joseph F Polak; João A Lima; David Bluemke; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Dhananjay Vaidya; Wendy L Bennett; Christopher T Sibley; Joseph F Polak; David M Herrington; Pamela Ouyang Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Tianyi Huang; Amy L Shafrir; A Heather Eliassen; Kathryn M Rexrode; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Angela G Fowler-Brown; Ian H de Boer; Janet M Catov; Mercedes R Carnethon; Aruna Kamineni; Lewis H Kuller; David S Siscovick; Kenneth J Mukamal Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michal Schnaider Beeri; Michael Rapp; James Schmeidler; Abraham Reichenberg; Dushyant P Purohit; Daniel P Perl; Hillel T Grossman; Isak Prohovnik; Vahram Haroutunian; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Gabriel E Fabreau; Sridharan Raghavan; Katherine Kentoffio; Yuchiao Chang; Wei He; Steven J Atlas; Sanja Percac-Lima Journal: J Community Health Date: 2016-12