Literature DB >> 17065166

Effects of a loading dose of morphine before i.v. morphine titration for postoperative pain relief: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control study.

F Aubrun1, J Amour, D Rosenthal, P Coriat, B Riou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: I.V. morphine titration (MT) allows adjustment of the dose needed for pain relief in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). However, MT has limitations such as a delay to achieve pain relief. We thus assessed the effect of a fixed intraoperative loading dose of morphine administered before titration.
METHODS: One hundred patients who were undergoing major orthopaedic surgery were included in a double-blind, randomized study comparing a loading dose of morphine (0.15 mg kg(-1)) with placebo administered intraoperatively. MT was then administered in the PACU followed by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over 24 h. Data are expressed as mean (sd).
RESULTS: The initial VAS [41 (36) vs 52 (35), NS] was not decreased in the morphine group. The VAS was lower in the morphine group in the PACU and PCA periods. The time to achieve effective pain relief was not decreased in the morphine group. The total dose of morphine administered in the PACU (including the loading dose) was significantly increased in the morphine group (+31% in mg kg(-1), P<0.05). Morphine requirements during the PCA period were not different between groups. The incidence of sedation was increased and a severe episode of ventilatory depression occurred in the morphine group.
CONCLUSIONS: A loading dose of morphine administered at the end of surgery slightly decreased the VAS but did not reduce the time to pain relief or morphine consumption within the first 24 h. This slight improvement in analgesia was obtained at the expense of morphine-related adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17065166     DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  Increasing intraoperative hydromorphone does not decrease postoperative pain: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Craig S Curry; Wendy Y Craig; Janelle M Richard; Denham S Ward
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Practice trends in use of morphine for control of intraoperative pain: An audit.

Authors:  Ajai Kumar Jain; Surendra Kumar; Asha Tyagi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

3.  Time of admission, gender and age: challenging factors in emergency renal colic - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Behzadnia; Hamid Reza Javadzadeh; Fatemeh Saboori
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2012-10-10

4.  Pharmacokinetic modeling of morphine and its glucuronides: Comparison of nebulization versus intravenous route in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Thomas Duflot; Tony Pereira; Marie-Pierre Tavolacci; Robinson Joannidès; Frédéric Aubrun; Fabien Lamoureux; Virginie Eve Lvovschi
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Preemptive morphine suppository for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Rahimi; Daryoush Moradi Farsani; Khosrou Naghibi; Babak Alikiaii
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Stephen Ward; Charlotte Guest; Ian Goodall; Carsten Bantel
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Satisfactory Analgesia with Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries (SAME DayS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus hydromorphone.

Authors:  Harsha Shanthanna; James Paul; Peter Lovrics; P J Devereaux; Mohit Bhandari; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.