Literature DB >> 17064837

Discussing and documenting (do not attempt) resuscitation orders in a Dutch Hospital: a disappointing reality.

Mieke Meilink1, Koos van de Wetering, Helen Klip.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the introduction of a patient information sheet about do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders and personal motivation of the medical staff results in an improvement in the documentation of the DNAR orders in the medical records.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHOD: The medical records for all hospital admissions during February 2005 were checked for age, sex, admission time, admitting specialty, admission type (acute or planned), death, documentation of the DNAR order on the admission form, and if this order was complied with and under whose initiative the order was implemented or not. These data were compared to the medical records from 2 years earlier.
RESULTS: In 2005, 119 (9.3%) medical records a DNAR order was found, compared to 10.7% in 2003. In the 43 patients who died DNAR orders were documented more often (18.6%) than in other patients (9%). The DNAR order was written more frequently for patients who were older (46.5 years versus 67.5 years), had a longer hospital admission period (4.2 versus 12.4 days) and for acute admissions. No difference was found for sex. Of the specialties with more than 10 admissions a month, the most frequently written DNAR orders came from internal medicine (36%) and pulmonology (31%); the least from cardiology (2.2%) and thoracic surgery (0%). In 9 of the 119 (7.6%) the DNAR orders were explained, most were initiated by the doctor (7), 1 by the patient an 1 by the family.
CONCLUSION: Giving patients more information about DNAR orders and motivating medical staff personally does not influence the documentation of DNAR orders. If documented, it occurred more in the elderly and the deceased patients. Only a few DNAR orders were specified and most were initiated by the doctor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17064837     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

Review 1.  Palliative Care in Surgery: Defining the Research Priorities.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Lilley; Zara Cooper; Margaret L Schwarze; Anne C Mosenthal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Factors related to withholding life-sustaining treatment in hospitalized elders.

Authors:  A Esteve; C Jimenez; R Perez; J A Gomez
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Clinical audit on documentation of anticipatory "not for resuscitation" orders in a tertiary Australian teaching hospital.

Authors:  Naveen Sulakshan Salins; Wendy Jansen
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2011-01

4.  Ethics and medico legal aspects of "not for resuscitation".

Authors:  Naveen Sulakshan Salins; Sachin Gopalakrishna Pai; Ms Vidyasagar; Manikkath Sobhana
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2010-05

5.  The Associations Between the Religious Background, Social Supports, and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Taiwan: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Kuan-Han Lin; Yih-Sharng Chen; Nai-Kuan Chou; Sheng-Jean Huang; Chau-Chung Wu; Yen-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Translating into Practice Cancer Patients' Views on Do-Not-Resuscitate Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ian N Olver; Jaklin A Eliott
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.