Literature DB >> 17063922

Group size and the framing effect: threats to human beings and animals.

Amber N Bloomfield1.   

Abstract

Past research provides conflicting evidence for the role of value in the appearance of framing effects. In this study, the effects of frame and group size were examined using scenarios about less valuable and more valuable groups (animal vs. human). In addition, two picture manipulations, intended to increase the value of the group, were presented. Choice patterns differed for the human and animal groups, with participants exhibiting greater risk seeking overall for the human scenario and showing a framing effect for humans but not animals when no pictures were presented. A small group size increased the proportion of risky choices for both the animal and human scenarios. Presenting pictures with names did lead to framing effects for animals, but providing pictures or pictures and names eliminated framing effects for the human scenario. These findings suggest that the relationship between value and framing effects is a matter of degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063922     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1999-06

2.  Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice.

Authors:  S L Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Music, pandas, and muggers: on the affective psychology of value.

Authors:  Christopher K Hsee; Yuval Rottenstreich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03

4.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1998-07

5.  Looking Closer at the Effects of Framing on Risky Choice: An Item Response Theory Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1998-07

6.  Domain-specific rationality in human choices: violations of utility axioms and social contexts.

Authors:  X T Wang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-07

Review 7.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing.

Authors:  A J Rothman; P Salovey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  An information processing view of framing effects: the role of causal schemas in decision making.

Authors:  J Jou; J Shanteau; R J Harris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-01

10.  Protected values: no omission bias and no framing effects.

Authors:  Carmen Tanner; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Explaining outcome type interactions with frame: aspiration level and the value function.

Authors:  Amber N Bloomfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

2.  Patrimony and the evolution of risk-taking.

Authors:  Michael D Stern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How can group experience influence the cue priority? A re-examination of the ambiguity-ambivalence hypothesis.

Authors:  Kazumi Shimizu; Daisuke Udagawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.