Literature DB >> 17063342

[Spectrum of patients in prehospital emergency services. What has changed over the last 20 years?].

M Bernhard1, T Hilger, M Sikinger, C Hainer, S Haag, K Streitberger, E Martin, A Gries.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Germany the physician staffed emergency systems have announced an increase in rescue missions over the years. The aim of this study is to analyse the development of the spectrum of patients in an emergency system over the last 20 years in order to highlight the significant changes.
METHODS: In a retrospective study we analyzed the prehospital chart views from 2004, 1992 and 1984 with respect to patients' demography, type of rescue mission, degree of internal disease or injury (NACA), state of consciousness (GCS), as well as prehospital interventions performed by prehospital emergency physician.
RESULTS: In 2004 (3,825), the absolute number of missions was 2 and 4 times higher than 1992 (2,114) and 1984 (957), resp. In all of these investigated time periods non-trauma missions (74%; 2,812 vs. 66%; 1,390 vs. 51%; 485) were leading, followed by trauma missions (18%; 690 vs. 22%; 464 vs. 39%; 375), aborted missions (3%; 126 vs. 7%; 154 vs. 6%; 56), and dead on arrival (5%; 197 vs. 5%; 106 vs. 4%; 41). Although, the percentage of patients with NACA IV-VI (39% vs. 50%) or patients with GCS < or =8 (18% vs. 34%) was lower in 2004, the absolute number of patients in each category was higher than in 1984 (NACA IV-VI: 1,434 vs. 448, p<0.01; GCS: 672 vs. 303, p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate, that the percentage of trauma, severely ill/injured or unconscious patients is lower than in previous years. However, the higher absolute numbers of patients demonstrate that the emergency physician now encounters more critically ill/injured, unconscious and trauma patients. It does not seem necessary to question the qualifications for an emergency physician, which have previously been considered essential for the management of acute life-threatening situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063342     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1106-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

Review 1.  [The future of preclinical emergency medicine in Germany].

Authors:  A Gries; M Helm; E Martin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation].

Authors:  U Schmidt; J Geerling; M Fühler; V Hubrich; M Richter; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Pharmacological peculiarities and problems with older patients].

Authors:  C D Kratz; A Schleppers; T Iber; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Pediatric cases in preclinical emergency medicine: critical aspects in the range of missions covered by ground ambulance and air rescue services].

Authors:  T Schlechtriemen; R Masson; K Burghofer; C K Lackner; K H Altemeyer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [Preclinical management of multiple trauma].

Authors:  M Bernhard; M Helm; A Aul; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Long-term trends of the demographic aging in Germany].

Authors:  Herwig Birg; E J Flöthmann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.281

  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  [Performance of prehospital emergency anesthesia and airway management : An online survey].

Authors:  T Warnecke; M Dobbermann; T Becker; M Bernhard; J Hinkelbein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Intraosseous infusion in the German Air Rescue Service : Guideline recommendations versus mission reality].

Authors:  M Helm; T Schlechtriemen; B Haunstein; M Gäßler; L Lampl; J Braun
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Use of intraosseus infusion in the German air rescue service : nationwide analysis in the time period 2005 to 2009].

Authors:  M Helm; B Hossfeld; T Schlechtriemen; J Braun; L Lampl; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Future of emergency medicine in Germany 2.0].

Authors:  A Gries; M Bernhard; M Helm; J Brokmann; J-T Gräsner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [On-scene times for helicopter services. Influence of central dispatch center strategy].

Authors:  A Gries; W Lenz; P Stahl; R Spiess; T Luiz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Principles of pediatric emergency care.

Authors:  Jochen Meyburg; Michael Bernhard; Georg F Hoffmann; Johann Motsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  [Development of ground-based physician-staffed emergency missions in the city of Leipzig from 2003 to 2013].

Authors:  K Bader; M Bernhard; A Gries; M Kaul; R Schröder; A Ramshorn-Zimmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  The quality of emergency medical care in baden-württemberg (Germany): four years in focus.

Authors:  Martin Messelken; Eduard Kehrberger; Burkhard Dirks; Matthias Fischer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Social Gradients in Myocardial Infarction and Stroke Diagnoses in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Christoph Hanefeld; Alexander Haschemi; Thomas Lampert; Hans J Trampisch; Andreas Mügge; Janine Miebach; Cordula Kloppe; Renate Klaaßen-Mielke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  [Improvement of emergency physician education through simulator training. Consideration on the basis of the model project "NASimSaar25"].

Authors:  W Armbruster; D Kubulus; T Schlechtriemen; J Adler; M Höhn; D Schmidt; S Duchêne; P Steiner; T Volk; M Wrobel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.