GOALS: The aims of this study were to determine the clinical use of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer and in the determination of tumor response after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. BACKGROUND: Despite advances in diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer, it is difficult to differentiate pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis. Even with current imaging modalities, it is also difficult to assess tumor response to therapeutic intervention. STUDY: One hundred two patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were selected for this study. Dynamic computerized tomography (CT) scan and FDG-PET were used sequentially to diagnose pancreatic cancer. After diagnostic confirmation their diagnostic yields were compared. We also evaluated the treatment response in 15 patients who underwent chemoradiation therapy with dynamic CT scan and FDG-PET and compared their results. RESULTS: In 93 out of 102 patients, pancreatic cancer was confirmed. FDG-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than CT scan (95.1% vs. 76.5%). FDG-PET was also superior to CT in the detection of liver metastasis. FDG-PET detected treatment response in 5 out of 15 cases after chemoradiation therapy, whereas CT could not detect any treatment response. Comparing responder and nonresponder, FDG-PET was able to predict significantly different prognosis (399 vs. 233 d, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a very useful tool in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. FDG-PET may be also used as an adjunct for determining the treatment modality of pancreatic cancer and evaluating tumor response to chemoradiation therapy.
GOALS: The aims of this study were to determine the clinical use of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer and in the determination of tumor response after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. BACKGROUND: Despite advances in diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer, it is difficult to differentiate pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis. Even with current imaging modalities, it is also difficult to assess tumor response to therapeutic intervention. STUDY: One hundred two patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were selected for this study. Dynamic computerized tomography (CT) scan and FDG-PET were used sequentially to diagnose pancreatic cancer. After diagnostic confirmation their diagnostic yields were compared. We also evaluated the treatment response in 15 patients who underwent chemoradiation therapy with dynamic CT scan and FDG-PET and compared their results. RESULTS: In 93 out of 102 patients, pancreatic cancer was confirmed. FDG-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than CT scan (95.1% vs. 76.5%). FDG-PET was also superior to CT in the detection of liver metastasis. FDG-PET detected treatment response in 5 out of 15 cases after chemoradiation therapy, whereas CT could not detect any treatment response. Comparing responder and nonresponder, FDG-PET was able to predict significantly different prognosis (399 vs. 233 d, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a very useful tool in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. FDG-PET may be also used as an adjunct for determining the treatment modality of pancreatic cancer and evaluating tumor response to chemoradiation therapy.
Authors: Avani S Dholakia; Muhammad Chaudhry; Jeffrey P Leal; Daniel T Chang; Siva P Raman; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Zheng Su; Jonathan Pai; Katharine E Oteiza; Mary E Griffith; Richard L Wahl; Erik Tryggestad; Timothy Pawlik; Daniel A Laheru; Christopher L Wolfgang; Albert C Koong; Joseph M Herman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yong Yue; Arsen Osipov; Benedick Fraass; Howard Sandler; Xiao Zhang; Nicholas Nissen; Andrew Hendifar; Richard Tuli Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2017-02