Literature DB >> 17063108

Sedation, topical pharyngeal anesthesia and cardiorespiratory safety during gastroscopy.

Matti Ristikankare1, Risto Julkunen, Markku Heikkinen, Matti Mattila, Tomi Laitinen, Shi-Xuan Wang, Juha Hartikainen.   

Abstract

GOALS: In a prospective, double-blind study, we examined the effects of routine sedation and pharyngeal anesthesia on cardiorespiratory parameters during gastroscopy.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous sedation and topical pharyngeal anesthesia are used to alleviate the discomfort during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cardiorespiratory changes during gastroscopy are common. STUDY: Two hundred fifty two consecutive outpatients undergoing gastroscopy were assigned into 4 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam and placebo throat spray (midazolam group), (2) placebo sedation and pharyngeal anesthesia with lidocaine throat spray (lidocaine group), (3) placebo sedation and placebo throat spray (placebo group), and (4) no intravenous cannula nor throat spray (control group). Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and continuous electrocardiogram were recorded before, during, and after the endoscopic procedure.
RESULTS: Gastroscopy increased heart rate in all study groups. Premedication with intravenous midazolam or lidocaine spray alleviated this rise (P<0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance) and decreased the incidence of tachycardia. Similarly, sedation with midazolam or topical pharyngeal anesthesia decreased the rise in systolic blood pressure (P<0.001). Midazolam produced lower SaO2 values during gastroscopy compared with lidocaine, placebo or control groups (P<0.001). However, episodes of desaturation (SaO2 </=92) were no more common in the midazolam group than in other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with midazolam alleviated the rise in heart rate and systolic blood pressure but induced a statistically significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation. However, gastroscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063108     DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225579.65761.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  6 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Qing-Tao Meng; Chen Cao; Hui-Min Liu; Zhong-Yuan Xia; Wei Li; Ling-Hua Tang; Rong Chen; Meng Jiang; Yang Wu; Yan Leng; Chris C Lee
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

3.  Validity Analysis of Neck Circumference as a Screening Test for Hypoxia Occurrence in Patients Undergoing Sedative Endoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun-Ji Song; Jiyun Kim
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03

4.  Comfort, safety and quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after 2 hours fasting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angélica Terezinha Koeppe; Marcio Lubini; Nilton Maiolini Bonadeo; Iran Moraes; Fernando Fornari
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Safety and efficacy of combined use of propofol and etomidate for sedation during gastroscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingyuan Chen; Xueyan Liang; Xinmei Tan; Haibin Wen; Junsong Jiang; Yan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Analgesic comparison of dezocine plus propofol versus fentanyl plus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Chun Li; Chuncheng Zhao; Zhengzhong Zhao; Yi Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.