Literature DB >> 17062805

MedGem hand-held indirect calorimeter is valid for resting energy expenditure measurement in healthy children.

David A Fields1, Jay T Kearney, Kenneth C Copeland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a new hand-held indirect calorimeter [MedGem (MG)] in the determination of resting energy expenditure (REE; kilocalories per day) in children. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: One hundred male (n = 54) and female (n = 46) children (10.6 +/- 3.2 years, 43.9 +/- 19.0 kg, 146.1 +/- 18.8 cm, 19.6 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2)) participated. Children arrived at the University of Oklahoma body composition laboratory between 5:30 am and 6:15 am after an overnight fast. On arrival, subjects voided and remained quietly in the supine position for 15 minutes before testing. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry (in random order), with both the MG (sitting upright) and the criterion Delta Trac II (DT) (supine). Data are reported as the mean +/- standard deviation.
RESULTS: The mean MG REE (1452 +/- 355 kcal/d) was significantly higher than DT REE (1349 +/- 296 kcal/d, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias (MG - DT) of 104 kcal/d, with limits of agreement of -241 to +449 kcal/d. To examine the difference in subject positioning, an independent sample of 38 subjects performed the MG in its normal position (sitting) and holding the MG in a supine position. REE by the MG in the sitting position (1475 +/- 350 kcal/d) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the MG in the supine position (1419 +/- 286 kcal/d). DISCUSSION: The mean difference in REE between MG and DT was relatively small (103 kcal/d) but significant; however, a portion of this difference may have been related to differences in subject positioning. These preliminary data indicate that the MG shows promise as a valid tool in the assessment of REE in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062805     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2006.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  6 in total

1.  Handheld calorimeter is a valid instrument to quantify resting energy expenditure in hospitalized cirrhotic patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Cathy Glass; Peggy Hipskind; Denise Cole; Rocio Lopez; Srinivasan Dasarathy
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.080

2.  Handheld Indirect Calorimetry as a Clinical Tool for Measuring Resting Energy Expenditure in Children with and without Obesity.

Authors:  David A White; Vincent S Staggs; Veronica Williams; Trent C Edwards; Robin Shook; Valentina Shakhnovich
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 3.  Do handheld calorimeters have a role in assessment of nutrition needs in hospitalized patients? A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Peggy Hipskind; Cathy Glass; Denise Charlton; Diane Nowak; Srinivasan Dasarathy
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.080

4.  Comparison of the GEM and the ECAL indirect calorimeters against the Deltatrac for measures of RMR and diet-induced thermogenesis.

Authors:  S Kennedy; L Ryan; A Fraser; M E Clegg
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2014-11-07

Review 5.  Indirect Calorimetry in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Marta Delsoglio; Najate Achamrah; Mette M Berger; Claude Pichard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Prediction of Resting Energy Expenditure in Children: May Artificial Neural Networks Improve Our Accuracy?

Authors:  Valentina De Cosmi; Alessandra Mazzocchi; Gregorio Paolo Milani; Edoardo Calderini; Silvia Scaglioni; Silvia Bettocchi; Veronica D'Oria; Thomas Langer; Giulia C I Spolidoro; Ludovica Leone; Alberto Battezzati; Simona Bertoli; Alessandro Leone; Ramona Silvana De Amicis; Andrea Foppiani; Carlo Agostoni; Enzo Grossi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.