Literature DB >> 17062403

Stick, unstick, restick sticky films in the colon.

Dimitra Dodou1, Paul Breedveld, Peter A Wieringa.   

Abstract

The main challenge in designing diagnostic devices able to move along the colon is their locomotion method. Manipulating friction with the colonic surface is a key requirement for their safe and atraumatic propagation. One possible solution is to generate friction by means of adhesive forces. For this reason, a diagnostic device can be covered with mucoadhesive films that are able to stick on the colonic surface by generating high static friction. For a smooth transition from static to dynamic regime, the mucoadhesive films should unstick just before the initialisation of motion. Experiments have shown that promoting cohesive fracture of the films by controllable air introduction does not lead to friction reduction sufficient for smooth unsticking. Introducing water at the film-colon interface, however, reduces the static friction significantly, and makes the device to unstick and slide smoothly without leaving film fragments on the colonic surface behind. If unsticking is initiated by means of air or water introduction, a new film is required each time the device is required to restick. As an alternative, the possibility of coating the device with environmentally-sensitive mucoadhesive polymers that can respond reversibly to external stimuli and alter their properties is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062403     DOI: 10.1080/13645700600929144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  3 in total

Review 1.  Capsule endoscopy of the future: What's on the horizon?

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Mucoadhesive film for anchoring assistive surgical instruments in endoscopic surgery: in vivo assessment of deployment and attachment.

Authors:  V Pensabene; P Valdastri; S Tognarelli; A Menciassi; A Arezzo; P Dario
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels.

Authors:  Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Stuart Coleman; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.