Literature DB >> 17062258

Early outcomes comparing Perfadex, Euro-Collins, and Papworth solutions in lung transplantation.

Takahiro Oto1, Anne P Griffiths, Franklin Rosenfeldt, Bronwyn J Levvey, Trevor J Williams, Gregory I Snell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improved surgical techniques and medical management, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a major cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Different types of lung preservation solutions have been developed and applied to clinical use; however, the relative clinical efficacy of these solutions to prevent PGD remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the three solutions most commonly used (Perfadex [Vitrolife, Göteborg, Sweden], Papworth, and Euro-Collins [Baxter Healthcare, Old Toongabbie NSW, Australia]) on posttransplant outcomes.
METHODS: Early outcomes from 157 consecutive lung transplants (113 bilateral and 44 single) performed at The Alfred Hospital were compared across three preservation solutions.
RESULTS: Posttransplant oxygenation (p = 0.57), pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.34), intubation hours (p = 0.66), intensive care unit days (p = 0.34), severe PGD (grade 3) (p = 0.70), 30-day mortality (p = 0.87), and 3-month % predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (p = 0.58) were not statistically different; however, Perfadex trended toward superiority among the three solutions. After adjustment of donor, recipient, and operative factors in multivariate analysis, Perfadex was significantly associated with the prevention of moderate to severe PGD (grade 2 to 3) at 48 hours posttransplant (odds ratio = 0.26 [0.10 to 0.72], p < 0.01) compared with Papworth (odds ratio = 0.75 [0.32 to 1.75], p = 0.51) and Euro-Collins (reference) solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: Although any advantageous effects of Perfadex on early posttransplant outcomes were generally subtle and statistically nonsignificant, Perfadex prevented moderate to severe PGD. Switching preservation solution from Euro-Collins (or Papworth) to Perfadex would appear to usefully contribute to a strategy to reduce PGD in lung transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062258     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Geographic distance between donor and recipient does not influence outcomes after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Sara A Hennessy; Tjasa Hranjec; Abbas Emaminia; Damien J Lapar; Benjamin D Kozower; Irving L Kron; David R Jones; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Preservation solutions for cardiac and pulmonary donor grafts: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Nicholas Latchana; Joshua R Peck; Bryan Whitson; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Low potassium dextran is superior to University of Wisconsin solution in high-risk lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Jeremiah G Allen; Christian A Merlo; William A Baumgartner; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 4.  Procurement of lungs from brain-dead donors.

Authors:  Prasad Krishnan; Sahar-Al-Sadat Sahar Saddoughi
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Frederick R Adler; Paul Aurora; David H Barker; Mark L Barr; Laura S Blackwell; Otto H Bosma; Samuel Brown; D R Cox; Judy L Jensen; Geoffrey Kurland; George D Nossent; Alexandra L Quittner; Walter M Robinson; Sandy L Romero; Helen Spencer; Stuart C Sweet; Wim van der Bij; J Vermeulen; Erik A M Verschuuren; Elianne J L E Vrijlandt; William Walsh; Marlyn S Woo; Theodore G Liou
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.