Literature DB >> 17061710

Topography-guided CATz versus conventional LASIK for myopia with the NIDEK EC-5000: A bilateral eye study.

Mansoor A Farooqui1, Abdul Rahman Al-Muammar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference in visual acuity, subjective night vision glare, and higher order aberrations in eyes with myopia with or without astigmatism operated with topography-guided customized corneal LASIK and conventional LASIK.
METHODS: This contralateral study includes 46 eyes (23 patients) that underwent topography-guided corneal customized LASIK using the customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) ablation profile in one eye and conventional LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 Advanced Vision Excimer laser system (NAVEX) in the other eye for myopia with or without astigmatism. Patients were masked to which eye underwent topography-guided CATz or conventional LASIK. Postoperative glare and root-mean-square (RMS) values for total higher order aberrations were measured at 1 and 3 months and compared between the two eyes.
RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in uncorrected visual acuity between the two groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Of all patients, 81% stated glare was higher in conventionally treated eyes than in the CATz-treated eyes at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The RMS values for total coma (0.2385 vs 0.1522) and spherical aberration (0.2381 vs 0.1058) in conventionally treated and CATz-treated eyes were significantly higher in conventionally treated eyes (P=.029 and P=.004, respectively) at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided corneal customized LASIK with the CATz profile gave better night vision quality as compared to conventional LASIK with expanded treatment zone. Better night vision quality was associated with less induced spherical aberrations and coma postoperatively in the CATz treatment group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17061710     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20061001-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Topographically guided LASIK for myopia using the Nidek CXII customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz).

Authors:  George Waring; Paul J Dougherty; Arturo Chayet; Jeffery Fischer; Barbara Fant; Gary Stevens; Harkaran S Bains
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

2.  Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Tirth J Shah; David Franklin Skanchy; Steven H Linn; Paul Kang; Daniel S Durrie
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-04

Review 3.  Topography-guided treatment in regular and irregular corneas.

Authors:  Shreyas Ramamurthy; B Soundarya; Gitansha S Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study.

Authors:  Ermano M Alves; Adriana F Lyra; Manuela Tenório; Natália Mesquita; Carolina Bacelar; Afra Montenegro; Lucas Alves; Márcio Alves
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Virgin Eyes.

Authors:  Sharif Hashmani; Nauman Hashmani; Husna Haroon; Yusra Hashmi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-31

6.  Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: A contralateral eye study.

Authors:  Nitin N Tiwari; Gitansha S Sachdev; Shreyas Ramamurthy; Ramamurthy Dandapani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.