BACKGROUND: African-American (AA) race has been associated with a worse outcome in breast cancer. It is unclear whether this is due to biological factors, socioeconomic factors, or both. METHODS: The records from 2 independent cohorts of breast cancer patients treated on institutional protocols with mastectomy and adjuvant (n = 1456) or neoadjuvant (n = 684) doxorubicin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The adjuvant (Adj) chemotherapy cohort included 1142 Caucasian (CA), 186 Hispanic (HI), and 128 (AA) patients. The neoadjuvant (Neo) chemotherapy protocols included 448 CA, 114 HI, and 122 AA patients. In both groups, AA patients had later-stage tumors (Adj P = .017; Neo P = .051), a higher rate of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease (Adj P = .054; Neo P = .039), and a worse 10-year actuarial overall survival rate than CA or HI patients (Adj, 52%, 62%, and 62%, respectively, P = .009; Neo, 40%, 50%, and 56%, respectively, P = .015). In multivariate analyses, AA race remained independently associated with a poorer overall survival rate in both cohorts (Adj, hazard ratio = 1.39, P = .018; Neo, hazard ratio = 1.37, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that AA race is associated with less favorable biological tumor features, such as an increased likelihood of ER-negative disease, than those found in CA and HI patients. Such differences in tumor biology, as well as previously described socioeconomic factors, likely contribute to the lower rate of survival in the AA breast cancer population. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: African-American (AA) race has been associated with a worse outcome in breast cancer. It is unclear whether this is due to biological factors, socioeconomic factors, or both. METHODS: The records from 2 independent cohorts of breast cancerpatients treated on institutional protocols with mastectomy and adjuvant (n = 1456) or neoadjuvant (n = 684) doxorubicin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The adjuvant (Adj) chemotherapy cohort included 1142 Caucasian (CA), 186 Hispanic (HI), and 128 (AA) patients. The neoadjuvant (Neo) chemotherapy protocols included 448 CA, 114 HI, and 122 AA patients. In both groups, AA patients had later-stage tumors (Adj P = .017; Neo P = .051), a higher rate of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease (Adj P = .054; Neo P = .039), and a worse 10-year actuarial overall survival rate than CA or HIpatients (Adj, 52%, 62%, and 62%, respectively, P = .009; Neo, 40%, 50%, and 56%, respectively, P = .015). In multivariate analyses, AA race remained independently associated with a poorer overall survival rate in both cohorts (Adj, hazard ratio = 1.39, P = .018; Neo, hazard ratio = 1.37, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that AA race is associated with less favorable biological tumor features, such as an increased likelihood of ER-negative disease, than those found in CA and HIpatients. Such differences in tumor biology, as well as previously described socioeconomic factors, likely contribute to the lower rate of survival in the AA breast cancer population. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Jessica M Pastoriza; George S Karagiannis; Juan Lin; Sonali Lanjewar; David Entenberg; John S Condeelis; Joseph A Sparano; Xiaonan Xue; Thomas E Rohan; Maja H Oktay Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Soley Bayraktar; Leonel F Hernadez-Aya; Xiudong Lei; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Jennifer K Litton; Limin Hsu; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Jennifer Litton; Huiqin Chen; Sharon H Giordano; Clifford A Hudis; Antonio C Wolff; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Melissa L Bondy; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shaheenah Dawood; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Marjorie C Green; Sharon H Giordano; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz; Constance Albarracin; Wei T Yang; Bryan T J Hennessy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathy S Albain; Joseph M Unger; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 13.506