BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of rectal cancer presents challenging problems. Although abdominal sacral resection (ASR) provides pain control, survival prolongation, and possibly cure, reported morbidity and mortality are still high, and survival is still low. Thus, appropriate patient selection and adjuvant therapy based on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns are necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ASR for posterior pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma and to analyze prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. METHODS: Forty-four patients underwent ASR for curative intent in 40 and palliative intent in 4 cases. All but one could be followed up completely. Multivariate analyses of factors influencing survival and positive surgical margins were conducted. RESULTS: Morbidity and mortality were 61% and 2%, respectively. Overall 5-year survival was 34%. The Cox regression model revealed a positive resection margin (hazard ratio, 10 [95% confidence interval, 3.8-28]), a local disease-free interval of <12 months (4.2 [1.8-9.8]), and pain radiating to the buttock or further (4.2 [1.6-11]) to be independently associated with poor survival. The logistic regression model showed that macroscopic multiple expanding or diffuse infiltrating growths were independently associated with a positive margin (7.5 [1.4-40]). Of the patients with recurrence, 56% had failures confined locally or to the lung. CONCLUSIONS: ASR is beneficial to selected patients in terms of survival. To select patients, evaluation of the resection margin, the local disease-free interval, pain extent, and macroscopic growth pattern is important. To improve survival, adjuvant treatment should be aimed at local and lung recurrences.
BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of rectal cancer presents challenging problems. Although abdominal sacral resection (ASR) provides pain control, survival prolongation, and possibly cure, reported morbidity and mortality are still high, and survival is still low. Thus, appropriate patient selection and adjuvant therapy based on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns are necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ASR for posterior pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma and to analyze prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. METHODS: Forty-four patients underwent ASR for curative intent in 40 and palliative intent in 4 cases. All but one could be followed up completely. Multivariate analyses of factors influencing survival and positive surgical margins were conducted. RESULTS: Morbidity and mortality were 61% and 2%, respectively. Overall 5-year survival was 34%. The Cox regression model revealed a positive resection margin (hazard ratio, 10 [95% confidence interval, 3.8-28]), a local disease-free interval of <12 months (4.2 [1.8-9.8]), and pain radiating to the buttock or further (4.2 [1.6-11]) to be independently associated with poor survival. The logistic regression model showed that macroscopic multiple expanding or diffuse infiltrating growths were independently associated with a positive margin (7.5 [1.4-40]). Of the patients with recurrence, 56% had failures confined locally or to the lung. CONCLUSIONS: ASR is beneficial to selected patients in terms of survival. To select patients, evaluation of the resection margin, the local disease-free interval, pain extent, and macroscopic growth pattern is important. To improve survival, adjuvant treatment should be aimed at local and lung recurrences.
Authors: Reza Mirnezami; George J Chang; Prajnan Das; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Paris Tekkis; Ara Darzi; Alexander H Mirnezami Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2012-12-25 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Raphaële Charest-Morin; Charles G Fisher; Ann L Versteeg; Arjun Sahgal; Peter Pal Varga; Daniel M Sciubba; James M Schuster; Michael H Weber; Michelle J Clarke; Laurence D Rhines; Stefano Boriani; Chetan Bettegowda; Michael G Fehlings; Paul M Arnold; Ziya L Gokaslan; Nicolas Dea Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-05