Literature DB >> 17061076

Ependymomas with neuronal differentiation: a morphologic and immunohistochemical spectrum.

Fausto J Rodriguez1, Bernd W Scheithauer, Peter D Robbins, Peter C Burger, Richard B Hessler, Arie Perry, Patrice C Abell-Aleff, Gary W Mierau.   

Abstract

The category of mixed glioneuronal tumors of the CNS is rapidly losing its definition as encompassing tumors composed of histologically distinct neuron variants and glia. We encountered five ependymomas with neuronal differentiation seen in two by histology, in two by immunohistochemistry alone, and in one by electron microscopy. Antibodies against GFAP, S-100 protein, neurofilament protein, chromogranin, synaptophysin, Neu-N, and EMA were applied. Ultrastructural studies were also performed. In addition, 33 randomly selected ependymomas of various histologic types were screened for these same antigens. Cases 1 and 2 were anaplastic and showed clearly defined neuropil islands or pale islands as in nodular desmoplastic medulloblastoma, respectively. The tumors affected a 16-year-old male and a 5-year-old female and involved the right frontoparietal lobe and fourth ventricle, respectively. The islands were positive for synaptophysin and Neu-N (cases 1 and 2), and chromogranin (case 1). Cases 3-5, as well as 7 of the 33 screened ependymomas, showed a suggestion of neuronal differentiation by immunohistochemistry alone, including immunoreactivity for Neu-N (n = 8), synaptophysin (n = 4), neurofilament protein (n = 4), and chromogranin (n = 2). Five tumors each were WHO grade II and III. Electron microscopy performed on the two cases with neuronal islands demonstrated microtubule bundles and dense core granules (case 1) and poorly differentiated cells with high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios, with intermediate filament accumulation and rare cilia (case 2). Cases identified by immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy demonstrated dense core granules (n = 5) and aligned microtubules (n = 3). Neuronal differentiation occurs in ependymomas but is less frequently definitive (histologic, ultrastructural) than merely a limited immunohistochemical finding. The clinical significance of these observations is unknown but deserves further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17061076     DOI: 10.1007/s00401-006-0153-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  14 in total

1.  Glioneuronal tumor with neuropil-like islands of the spinal cord with diffuse leptomeningeal neuraxis dissemination.

Authors:  Bree Ruppert; Cynthia T Welsh; Jessica Hannah; Pierre Giglio; Zoran Rumboldt; Ian Johnson; John Fortney; Joseph M Jenrette; Sunil Patel; Bernd W Scheithauer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Neuronal differentiation distinguishes supratentorial and infratentorial childhood ependymomas.

Authors:  Felipe Andreiuolo; Stéphanie Puget; Matthieu Peyre; Carmela Dantas-Barbosa; Nathalie Boddaert; Cathy Philippe; Audrey Mauguen; Jacques Grill; Pascale Varlet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Extraventricular anaplastic ependymoma with metastasis to scalp and neck.

Authors:  Matthew J Davis; Fauzia Hasan; Ilan Weinreb; M Christopher Wallace; Tim-Rasmus Kiehl
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Supra- and infratentorial pediatric ependymomas differ significantly in NeuN, p75 and GFAP expression.

Authors:  Christian Hagel; András Treszl; Julia Fehlert; Jonas Harder; Franziska von Haxthausen; Meike Kern; André O von Bueren; Uwe Kordes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prognostic significance of neuronal marker expression in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwa Lee; Kyung-Joo Kang; Kyung-Sub Moon; Tae-Young Jung; Shin Jung; Jae-Hyoo Kim; Hyung-Seok Kim; Min-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Interphase cytogenetics for 1p19q and t(1;19)(q10;p10) may distinguish prognostically relevant subgroups in extraventricular neurocytoma.

Authors:  Fausto J Rodriguez; Renan A Mota; Bernd W Scheithauer; Caterina Giannini; Hilary Blair; Kent C New; Kevin J Wu; Dennis W Dickson; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.508

7.  Patterns of brain infiltration and secondary structure formation in supratentorial ependymal tumors.

Authors:  Norman L Lehman
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Neuronal markers are expressed in human gliomas and NSE knockdown sensitizes glioblastoma cells to radiotherapy and temozolomide.

Authors:  Tao Yan; Kai Ove Skaftnesmo; Lina Leiss; Linda Sleire; Jian Wang; Xingang Li; Per Øyvind Enger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Promoted Growth of Brain Tumor by the Transplantation of Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Facilitated by CXCL12.

Authors:  Nai-Wei Yao; Chiao-Chi V Chen; Chen-Tung Yen; Chen Chang
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Donor-derived brain tumor following neural stem cell transplantation in an ataxia telangiectasia patient.

Authors:  Ninette Amariglio; Abraham Hirshberg; Bernd W Scheithauer; Yoram Cohen; Ron Loewenthal; Luba Trakhtenbrot; Nurit Paz; Maya Koren-Michowitz; Dalia Waldman; Leonor Leider-Trejo; Amos Toren; Shlomi Constantini; Gideon Rechavi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.