Literature DB >> 17060778

What is the methodologic quality of human therapy studies in ISI surgical publications?

Carlos Manterola1, Viviana Pineda, Manuel Vial, Héctor Losada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the methodologic quality of therapy articles about humans published in ISI surgical journals, and to explore the association between methodologic quality, origin, and subject matter. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is supposed that ISI journals contain the best methodologic articles.
METHODS: This is a bibliometric study. All journals listed in the 2002 ISI under the subject heading of "Surgery" were included. A simple randomized sampling was conducted for selected journals (Annals of Surgery, The American Surgeon, Archives of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery, European Journal of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Surgery, and World Journal of Surgery). Published articles related to therapy on humans of the selected journals were reviewed and analyzed. All kinds of clinical designs were considered, excluding editorials, review articles, letters to the editor, and experimental studies. The variables considered were: place of origin, design, and the methodologic quality of articles, which was determined by applying a valid and reliable scale. The review was performed interchangeably and independently by 2 research teams. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used. Statistical significance was defined as P values less than 1%.
RESULTS: A total of 653 articles were studied. Studies came predominantly from the United States and Europe (43.6% and 36.8%, respectively). The subject areas most frequently found were digestive and hepatobiliopancreatic surgery (29.1% and 24.5%, respectively). Average and median methodologic quality scores of the entire series were 11.6 +/- 4.9 points and 11 points, respectively. The association between methodologic quality and journals was determined. Also, the association between methodologic quality and origin was observed, but no association with subject area was verified.
CONCLUSIONS: The methodologic quality of therapy articles published in the journals analyzed is low; however, statistical significance was determined between them. Association was observed between methodologic quality and origin, but not with subject matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060778      PMCID: PMC1856594          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000242708.51631.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Innovation in surgery: the rules of evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The value of medical publications: 'to read them would...burden the memory to no useful purpose'.

Authors:  S W Beasley
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-12

3.  Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard.

Authors:  Shawn J Rangel; Jennifer Kelsey; Marion C W Henry; R Lawrence Moss
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Sanjay Saint; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-01

5.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Surgery for morbid obesity: selection of operation based on evidence from literature review.

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Viviana Pineda; Manuel Vial; Héctor Losada; Sergio Muñoz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  [Is impact factor an appropriate index to determine the level of evidence of studies on therapeutic procedures in surgery journals?].

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Viviana Pineda; Manuel Vial; Héctor Losada
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.653

8.  [What is the methodological quality of articles on therapeutic procedures published in Cirugía Española?].

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Juli Busquets; Marta Pascual; Luis Grande
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.653

9.  [Improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials. Recommendations of the CONSORT Study Group].

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  Rev Esp Salud Publica       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  [Open versus laparoscopic resection in non-complicated colon cancer. A systematic review].

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Viviana Pineda; Manuel Vial
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.653

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.

Authors:  P Carnuccio; J Jimeno; D Parés
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.781

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.