C Regan1, C Katona, Z Walker, J Hooper, J Donovan, G Livingston. 1. Royal Free & University College Medical School, UCL, Department of Mental Health Sciences, Holborn Union Building, Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW UK. ciaran.regan@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) who have vascular risk factors have a worse prognosis over 18 months vs those without such risk factors. METHODS: A sample of 224 people with AD and their caregivers were recruited purposively to be representative of people with dementia in terms of cognition, sex, and living situations in a longitudinal study of AD. Standardized instruments measuring cognition, functional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were used to collect data. Physical examination and relevant blood tests were performed. RESULT: There was no difference in rate of deterioration between people with and without vascular risk factors, except in those who had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during the 18-month follow-up (p < 0.001). We considered possible confounders of outcome: sex, age, years of education, severity of dementia, depression, taking cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), and whether those with vascular risk factors were more likely to die, but the results remained unchanged. Stopping AChEIs during the study was associated with cognitive and functional decline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular risk factors as measured clinically and biochemically do not significantly increase deterioration at 18 months in people with Alzheimer disease who have a low burden of cerebrovascular risk factors. However, cerebrovascular events are associated with more rapid decline. Vascular risk factors may contribute to the expression of Alzheimer disease initially but are not part of the underlying etiologic process.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) who have vascular risk factors have a worse prognosis over 18 months vs those without such risk factors. METHODS: A sample of 224 people with AD and their caregivers were recruited purposively to be representative of people with dementia in terms of cognition, sex, and living situations in a longitudinal study of AD. Standardized instruments measuring cognition, functional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were used to collect data. Physical examination and relevant blood tests were performed. RESULT: There was no difference in rate of deterioration between people with and without vascular risk factors, except in those who had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during the 18-month follow-up (p < 0.001). We considered possible confounders of outcome: sex, age, years of education, severity of dementia, depression, taking cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), and whether those with vascular risk factors were more likely to die, but the results remained unchanged. Stopping AChEIs during the study was associated with cognitive and functional decline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular risk factors as measured clinically and biochemically do not significantly increase deterioration at 18 months in people with Alzheimer disease who have a low burden of cerebrovascular risk factors. However, cerebrovascular events are associated with more rapid decline. Vascular risk factors may contribute to the expression of Alzheimer disease initially but are not part of the underlying etiologic process.
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Sarah N Forrester; Christopher D Corcoran; Maria C Norton; Peter V Rabins; Martin I Steinberg; Joann T Tschanz; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Whitney Wharton; James H Stein; Claudia Korcarz; Jane Sachs; Sandra R Olson; Henrik Zetterberg; Maritza Dowling; Shuyun Ye; Carey E Gleason; Gail Underbakke; Laura E Jacobson; Sterling C Johnson; Mark A Sager; Sanjay Asthana; Cynthia M Carlsson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Mark W Bondi; Amy J Jak; Lisa Delano-Wood; Mark W Jacobson; Dean C Delis; David P Salmon Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: M E Soto; S Andrieu; C Arbus; M Ceccaldi; P Couratier; T Dantoine; J-F Dartigues; S Gillette-Guyonnet; F Nourhashemi; P-J Ousset; M Poncet; F Portet; J Touchon; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Maria C Norton; Kathleen W Piercy; Peter V Rabins; Robert C Green; John C S Breitner; Truls Ostbye; Christopher Corcoran; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Constantine G Lyketsos; Joann T Tschanz Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Elizabeth Head; Frederick A Schmitt; Paulina R Davis; Janna H Neltner; Gregory A Jicha; Erin L Abner; Charles D Smith; Linda J Van Eldik; Richard J Kryscio; Stephen W Scheff Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Gary W Small; Susan Y Bookheimer; Paul M Thompson; Greg M Cole; S-C Huang; Vladimir Kepe; Jorge R Barrio Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 44.182