Carole Willard1, Karen Luker. 1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. carole.willard@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research exploring patients' care and treatment preferences at the end of life (EOL) suggests they prefer comfort more than life-extension, wish to participate in decision-making, and wish to die at home. Despite these preferences, the place of death for many patients is the acute hospital, where EOL interventions are reported to be inappropriately invasive and aggressive. AIM: This paper discusses the challenges to appropriate EOL care in acute hospitals in the UK, highlighting how this setting contributes to the patients' and families' care and treatment requirements being excluded from decision-making. METHODS: Twenty-nine cancer nurse specialists from five hospitals participated in a grounded theory study, using observation and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected and analysed concurrently using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: EOL interventions in the acute setting were driven by a preoccupation with treatment, routine practice and negative perceptions of palliative care. All these factors shaped clinical decision-making and prevented patients and their families from fully participating in clinical decision-making at the EOL.
BACKGROUND: Research exploring patients' care and treatment preferences at the end of life (EOL) suggests they prefer comfort more than life-extension, wish to participate in decision-making, and wish to die at home. Despite these preferences, the place of death for many patients is the acute hospital, where EOL interventions are reported to be inappropriately invasive and aggressive. AIM: This paper discusses the challenges to appropriate EOL care in acute hospitals in the UK, highlighting how this setting contributes to the patients' and families' care and treatment requirements being excluded from decision-making. METHODS: Twenty-nine cancer nurse specialists from five hospitals participated in a grounded theory study, using observation and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected and analysed concurrently using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: EOL interventions in the acute setting were driven by a preoccupation with treatment, routine practice and negative perceptions of palliative care. All these factors shaped clinical decision-making and prevented patients and their families from fully participating in clinical decision-making at the EOL.
Authors: Celina F Estacio; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie R Lovell; Skye T Dong; Josephine M Clayton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amada Pellico-López; Manuel Herrero-Montes; David Cantarero Prieto; Ana Fernández-Feito; Joaquin Cayon-De Las Cuevas; Paula Parás-Bravo; María Paz-Zulueta Journal: PeerJ Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.061
Authors: Andrea Bruun; Linda Oostendorp; Steven Bloch; Nicola White; Lucy Mitchinson; Ali-Rose Sisk; Patrick Stone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anne B Wichmann; Hanna van Dam; Bregje Thoonsen; Theo A Boer; Yvonne Engels; A Stef Groenewoud Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 2.497