AIMS: To describe English specialist palliative care (SPC) services' provision for, and attitude to, heart failure patients, and to identify developments of particular interest or expertise in this area. METHOD: Postal survey of all lead consultants of English SPC services, September 2004. RESULTS: Of 397 services, 233 replied (response rate 59%); 222 (95%) thought SPC had a role in severe/end stage heart failure, while three (1%) did not. A total of 197 services (85%) accepted heart failure patients, 26 (11%) did not. The most common reasons for not accepting heart failure patients were lack of resources or beds, implications for staff training or an organizational decision. The mean number of heart failure patients currently under a service was 2.2, but 15 had more than five (maximum 53). Fifteen services (6%) had specific referral criteria for heart failure patients, including recurrent hospital admissions without symptomatic improvement, inappropriateness of further hospital admission and severity of heart failure. Twelve services (5%) had or were developing treatment guidelines for heart failure: five were end of life pathways, three covered breathlessness management and three were symptom control guidelines. Some 137 services (59%) described local collaborative initiatives between SPC, heart failure services and primary care, such as mutual education, joint working and working groups. A number of models of joint working practices were described in detail. Twenty-seven (12%) knew of national initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The current situation of SPC services in England for patients with heart failure varies widely. One in 10 SPC services in this audit did not accept heart failure patients. Few have developed services of significant size. Local collaborative initiatives are common. Specific referral criteria and symptom control guidelines have been developed. Their role in promoting good palliative care in patients with heart failure remains unclear. Better dissemination of practical knowledge gained by these initiatives could significantly improve the provision of SPC services to heart failure patients.
AIMS: To describe English specialist palliative care (SPC) services' provision for, and attitude to, heart failurepatients, and to identify developments of particular interest or expertise in this area. METHOD: Postal survey of all lead consultants of English SPC services, September 2004. RESULTS: Of 397 services, 233 replied (response rate 59%); 222 (95%) thought SPC had a role in severe/end stage heart failure, while three (1%) did not. A total of 197 services (85%) accepted heart failurepatients, 26 (11%) did not. The most common reasons for not accepting heart failurepatients were lack of resources or beds, implications for staff training or an organizational decision. The mean number of heart failurepatients currently under a service was 2.2, but 15 had more than five (maximum 53). Fifteen services (6%) had specific referral criteria for heart failurepatients, including recurrent hospital admissions without symptomatic improvement, inappropriateness of further hospital admission and severity of heart failure. Twelve services (5%) had or were developing treatment guidelines for heart failure: five were end of life pathways, three covered breathlessness management and three were symptom control guidelines. Some 137 services (59%) described local collaborative initiatives between SPC, heart failure services and primary care, such as mutual education, joint working and working groups. A number of models of joint working practices were described in detail. Twenty-seven (12%) knew of national initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The current situation of SPC services in England for patients with heart failure varies widely. One in 10 SPC services in this audit did not accept heart failurepatients. Few have developed services of significant size. Local collaborative initiatives are common. Specific referral criteria and symptom control guidelines have been developed. Their role in promoting good palliative care in patients with heart failure remains unclear. Better dissemination of practical knowledge gained by these initiatives could significantly improve the provision of SPC services to heart failurepatients.
Authors: Yuchieh Kathryn Chang; Holland Kaplan; Yimin Geng; Li Mo; Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Larry A Allen; John A McClung; Martin A Denvir; David Hui Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Michael J Bonares; Ken Mah; Jane MacIver; Lindsay Hurlburt; Ebru Kaya; Gary Rodin; Heather Ross; Camilla Zimmermann; Kirsten Wentlandt Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-12-09
Authors: Jake Tobin; Alice Rogers; Isaac Winterburn; Sebastian Tullie; Asanish Kalyanasundaram; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.633