Literature DB >> 17060203

Multipolar consensus for phylogenetic trees.

Cécile Bonnard1, Vincent Berry, Nicolas Lartillot.   

Abstract

Collections of phylogenetic trees are usually summarized using consensus methods. These methods build a single tree, supposed to be representative of the collection. However, in the case of heterogeneous collections of trees, the resulting consensus may be poorly resolved (strict consensus, majority-rule consensus, ...), or may perform arbitrary choices among mutually incompatible clades, or splits (greedy consensus). Here, we propose an alternative method, which we call the multipolar consensus (MPC). Its aim is to display all the splits having a support above a predefined threshold, in a minimum number of consensus trees, or poles. We show that the problem is equivalent to a graph-coloring problem, and propose an implementation of the method. Finally, we apply the MPC to real data sets. Our results indicate that, typically, all the splits down to a weight of 10% can be displayed in no more than 4 trees. In addition, in some cases, biologically relevant secondary signals, which would not have been present in any of the classical consensus trees, are indeed captured by our method, indicating that the MPC provides a convenient exploratory method for phylogenetic analysis. The method was implemented in a package freely available at http://www.lirmm.fr/~cbonnard/MPC.html

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060203     DOI: 10.1080/10635150600969880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  5 in total

1.  An intuitive, informative, and most balanced representation of phylogenetic topologies.

Authors:  Wataru Iwasaki; Toshihisa Takagi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  On Defining and Finding Islands of Trees and Mitigating Large Island Bias.

Authors:  Ana Serra Silva; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  A new fast method for inferring multiple consensus trees using k-medoids.

Authors:  Nadia Tahiri; Matthieu Willems; Vladimir Makarenkov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Multiple consensus trees: a method to separate divergent genes.

Authors:  Alain Guénoche
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Assessing parallel gene histories in viral genomes.

Authors:  Beatriz Mengual-Chuliá; Stéphanie Bedhomme; Guillaume Lafforgue; Santiago F Elena; Ignacio G Bravo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.