Literature DB >> 17060086

Patients' experience with ambulatory urodynamics. A prospective study.

Seung-June Oh1, Hwancheol Son, Jeong Yun Jeong, Ja Hyeon Ku.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess emotional variables in patients who underwent ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 33 females and 7 males aged 23-72 years with an overactive bladder who had undergone three consecutive AUM sessions were included in the study on a prospective basis. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire before and immediately after each procedure. Answers were given using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: The pre-procedural level of anxiety did not differ significantly with respect to sex, age, education level or income. The degree of bother experienced by patients aged > or = 50 years was higher than for those aged < 50 years: 5 vs 2.5 (p = 0.030). As income increased, the degrees of pain (p = 0.016), bother (p = 0.013) and boredom (p = 0.010) decreased. Other emotional aspects did not differ significantly according to age or income (p > 0.05). Only the subjective bother score influenced the examiner-rated degree of intolerance during AUM (p = 0.007). A total of 34 patients (85.0%) indicated that they would be willing to return for a further session of AUM. The degree of intolerance decreased at the second (p = 0.006) and third (p = 0.049) AUM sessions, whereas other parameters were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that AUM is acceptable and well tolerated by patients with bladder dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060086     DOI: 10.1080/00365590600744014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  7 in total

1.  The role of ambulatory urodynamics in investigation of female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jonathan Chester; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Fidan Israfil-Bayli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.

Authors:  Amanda L Lewis; Grace J Young; Lucy E Selman; Caoimhe Rice; Clare Clement; Cynthia A Ochieng; Paul Abrams; Peter S Blair; Christopher Chapple; Cathryn Ma Glazener; Jeremy Horwood; John S McGrath; Sian Noble; Gordon T Taylor; J Athene Lane; Marcus J Drake
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Latissimus dorsi detrusor myoplasty to restore voiding in patients with an acontractile bladder - fact or fiction?

Authors:  Gommert van Koeveringe; Kevin Rademakers; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  How painful is multichannel urodynamic testing?

Authors:  Yakir Segev; Talma Rosen; Ron Auslender; Lena Dain; Yoram Abramov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-24

5.  Recommendations for conducting invasive urodynamics for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: Qualitative interview findings from a large randomized controlled trial (UPSTREAM).

Authors:  Lucy E Selman; Cynthia A Ochieng; Amanda L Lewis; Marcus J Drake; Jeremy Horwood
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 6.  Acceptability and perceived value of urodynamics from the patient perspective: A narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Andrea Braga; Peter F W M Rosier; Stefan de Wachter; Alan Uren; Enrico Finazzi-Agrò
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Wireless intravesical device for real-time bladder pressure measurement: Study of consecutive voiding in awake minipigs.

Authors:  Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi; Marko Bakula; Lukman Hakim; Robert Puers; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.