BACKGROUND: Global differences in Demirjian et al.'s method of assessing dental maturity are thought to be due to population differences. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of individual tooth formation stages in children from eight countries. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a meta-analysis of previously published data from retrospective cross-sectional studies of dental maturity. METHOD: Data of mandibular permanent developing teeth from panoramic radiographs (Demirjian's stages) were combined from Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, Finland, France, South Korea and Sweden (n = 9002, ages 2-16.99 years). Age-of-attainment was calculated using logistic regression for each group by sex and meta-analysis of the total. Overlapping 95% confidence intervals of the means was interpreted as no significant difference. RESULTS: Mean ages for each group and total were significantly different in 65 out of 509 comparisons (p < 0.05). Some of these were of small sample size but there was no consistent pattern. Apex closure of the first molar was significantly later in children from Quebec and this might explain differences found in the dental maturity score. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest no major differences in the timing of tooth formation stages between these children. This fails to explain previous findings of differences using Demirjian's dental maturity method.
BACKGROUND: Global differences in Demirjian et al.'s method of assessing dental maturity are thought to be due to population differences. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of individual tooth formation stages in children from eight countries. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a meta-analysis of previously published data from retrospective cross-sectional studies of dental maturity. METHOD: Data of mandibular permanent developing teeth from panoramic radiographs (Demirjian's stages) were combined from Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, Finland, France, South Korea and Sweden (n = 9002, ages 2-16.99 years). Age-of-attainment was calculated using logistic regression for each group by sex and meta-analysis of the total. Overlapping 95% confidence intervals of the means was interpreted as no significant difference. RESULTS: Mean ages for each group and total were significantly different in 65 out of 509 comparisons (p < 0.05). Some of these were of small sample size but there was no consistent pattern. Apex closure of the first molar was significantly later in children from Quebec and this might explain differences found in the dental maturity score. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest no major differences in the timing of tooth formation stages between these children. This fails to explain previous findings of differences using Demirjian's dental maturity method.
Authors: Angelines Cruz-Landeira; Jesabeth Linares-Argote; María Martínez-Rodríguez; María Sol Rodríguez-Calvo; Xosé Luis Otero; Luis Concheiro Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Guy Willems; Sang-Seob Lee; Andre Uys; Herman Bernitz; Maria Cadenas de Llano-Pérula; Steffen Fieuws; Patrick Thevissen Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 2.686