Literature DB >> 17059897

Periportal lymphadenopathy in patients without identifiable pancreatobiliary or hepatic malignancy.

Naveen B Krishna1, Laura Gardner, Brian T Collins, Banke Agarwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enlarged periportal lymph nodes often are noticed during imaging of the upper abdomen. Malignant infiltration and enlargement of periportal nodes occur in patients with cancers of the liver, gallbladder, biliary tree, and pancreas and lymphoma. However, there are no published data on the significance and differential diagnosis of enlarged periportal lymph nodes in patients without the above mentioned cancers.
METHODS: We searched our database for patients who (1) underwent endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of enlarged periportal nodes or (2) were found to have enlarged periportal lymph nodes (> or =10 mm) during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination. Patients with identifiable pancreatic, biliary, gallbladder, or liver cancers were excluded. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of one or more nodes was performed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with periportal lymph nodes 10-40 mm in size met the inclusion criteria. In 24 patients, enlarged periportal nodes were noted in the computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Fifty-one patients had multiple enlarged periportal nodes. Concomitantly, enlargement was seen in peripancreatic nodes (n = 14), celiac nodes (n = 14), and mediastinal nodes (n = 11). Twelve of the 64 patients (18.8%; 95% confidence interval, 9.2%-28.4%) had a malignant cause of enlarged periportal lymph nodes: 5 with metastatic carcinoma and 7 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Significant cytologic findings in benign nodes included granulomas (n = 4) and lipogranulomatosis (n = 8).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients with enlarged periportal lymph nodes without identifiable pancreatobiliary and liver cancer harbor malignancy and other identifiable pathologic processes. We recommend that these nodes be sampled with fine-needle aspiration at the time of EUS examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059897     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  3 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of radiologic abnormalities of the liver and biliary tree.

Authors:  Girish Mishra; Jason D Conway
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

2.  Impact of margin status and lymphadenectomy on clinical outcomes in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Arsen Osipov; Jason Naziri; Andrew Hendifar; Deepti Dhall; Joanne K Rutgers; Shefali Chopra; Quanlin Li; Mourad Tighiouart; Alagappan Annamalai; Nicholas N Nissen; Richard Tuli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

3.  Factors predictive of adverse events associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions.

Authors:  Akio Katanuma; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Kei Yane; Shunpei Hashigo; Toshihumi Kin; Maki Kaneko; Shin Kato; Ryusuke Kato; Ryo Harada; Manabu Osanai; Kuniyuki Takahashi; Masanori Nojima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.