Literature DB >> 17059715

Electronic patient data confidentiality practices among surgical trainees: questionnaire study.

Damian J Mole1, Colin Fox, Giulio Napolitano.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this work was to evaluate the safeguards implemented by surgical trainees to protect the confidentiality of electronic patient data through a structured questionnaire sent to Northern Ireland surgical trainees. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A group of 32 basic and higher surgical trainees attending a meeting of the Northern Ireland Association of Surgeons-in-Training were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their computer use, UK Data Protection Act, 1988 registration and electronic data confidentiality practices.
RESULTS: Of these 32 trainees, 29 returned completed questionnaires of whom 26 trainees regularly stored sensitive patient data for audit or research purposes on a computer. Only one person was registered under the Data Protection Act, 1988. Of the computers used to store and analyse sensitive data, only 3 of 14 desktops, 8 of 19 laptops and 3 of 14 hand-held computers forced a password logon. Of the 29 trainees, 16 used the same password for all machines, and 25 of 27 passwords were less than 8 characters long. Two respondents declined to reveal details of their secure passwords. Half of all trainees had never adjusted their internet security settings, despite all 14 desktops, 16 of 19 laptops and 5 of 14 hand-helds being routinely connected to the internet. Of the 29 trainees, 28 never encrypted their sensitive data files. Ten trainees had sent unencrypted sensitive patient data over the internet, using a non-secure server.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic data confidentiality practices amongst Northern Ireland surgical trainees are unsafe. Simple practical measures to safeguard confidentiality are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059715      PMCID: PMC1963756          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X117089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  3 in total

1.  GPs worried about having to change to new untested software systems.

Authors:  Rebecca Coombes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

Review 2.  Handheld computers.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Ubaydli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

3.  Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Sharon B Schweikhart; Mitchell A Medow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Annual survey on the level and extent of usage of electronic health records in government-related hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sulaiman Bah; Hana Alharthi; Azza Ali El Mahalli; Abdelkaream Jabali; Mona Al-Qahtani; Nouf Al-kahtani
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Reply to letter to the editor: Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Orrin I Franko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Analysis of the ethical aspects of professional confidentiality in dental practice.

Authors:  Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin; Artênio José Isper Garbin; Nemre Adas Saliba; Daniela Coelho de Lima; Ana Paula Ayala de Macedo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  "Is There An App For That?" Orthopaedic Patient Preferences For A Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Jonathan R Datillo; Daniel J Gittings; Matthew Sloan; William M Hardaker; Matthew J Deasey; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Smartphone use in neurosurgery? APP-solutely!

Authors:  Michael Zaki; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-07-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.