Literature DB >> 17059699

Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians?

Nir Menachemi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite existing knowledge regarding electronic health record (EHR) barriers in the ambulatory setting, little is known, specifically, about physicians who are likely to adopt EHR imminently. The current study identifies these imminent adopters and compares their barriers to other physicians. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Mail survey of Florida physicians (n = 14,921) about barriers to EHR and adoption intentions. The survey asked respondents to classify themselves as planning to adopt an EHR system within one year (herein referred to as 'imminent adopters'), as planning to adopt an EHR system but not within one year ('interested adopters'), and as not considering an EHR system. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify trends among imminent adopters and to compare barriers among respondents in each of the adoption categories above.
RESULTS: A total of 4203 returned surveys represented a 28.2% response rate. Imminent adopters were significantly less likely to be in solo practice (19.6% vs. 40.0%,P < 0.001) and more likely to be in an urban area (P = 0.044) or in a multi-specialty practice (P = 0.023). Imminent adopters were also more likely to be practising family medicine (P = 0.014) or obstetrics/gynaecology (P = 0.038). When compared with their colleagues, imminent adopters perceived EHR barriers very differently. For example, imminent adopters were significantly less likely to consider upfront cost of hardware/software [OR = 0.35 (0.30, 0.45)] or that an inadequate return on investment [OR = 0.25 (0.19, 0.34)] was a major barrier to EHR. Moreover, imminent adopters differed from their colleagues with respect to numerous other productivity-related and technical-related barriers.
CONCLUSION: Policy and decision makers interested in promoting the adoption of EHR among physicians should focus on the needs and barriers of those most likely to adopt EHR. Given that imminent adopters differ considerably from their peers, current EHR incentive programmes that focus on financial barriers only might prove sub-optimal in achieving immediate widespread EHR adoption.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059699     DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v14i2.620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inform Prim Care        ISSN: 1475-9985


  19 in total

1.  EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions.

Authors:  Mary E Morton; Susan Wiedenbeck
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  A framework for predicting EHR adoption attitudes: a physician survey.

Authors:  Mary E Morton; Susan Wiedenbeck
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-09-16

3.  Top 10 Lessons Learned from Electronic Medical Record Implementation in a Large Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Milisa K Rizer; Beth Kaufman; Cynthia J Sieck; Jennifer L Hefner; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  The relationship between local hospital IT capabilities and physician EMR adoption.

Authors:  Nir Menachemi; Michael Matthews; Eric W Ford; Neset Hikmet; Robert G Brooks
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Does an education intervention improve physician signature legibility? Pilot study of a prospective chart review.

Authors:  James K Glisson; Mary E Morton; Allyn H Bond; Michael Griswold
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-04-01

6.  Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners' perspectives.

Authors:  Stephanie O Zandieh; Erika L Abramson; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Kay Yoon-Flannery; Alison Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Impact of a prototype visualization tool for new information in EHR clinical documents.

Authors:  O Farri; A Rahman; K A Monsen; R Zhang; S V Pakhomov; D S Pieczkiewicz; S M Speedie; G B Melton
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  The impact of geography on hospital electronic health records implementation in alabama: implications for meaningful use.

Authors:  S H Houser; D Au; R Weech-Maldonado
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Multi-level analysis of electronic health record adoption by health care professionals: a study protocol.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Mathieu Ouimet; Gaston Godin; Michel Rousseau; Michel Labrecque; Yvan Leduc; Anis Ben Abdeljelil
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Evolution of child mental health services in primary care.

Authors:  Kelly J Kelleher; Jack Stevens
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.