Literature DB >> 17059493

Resource use and service costs for ventilator-dependent children and young people in the UK.

Jane Noyes1, Christine Godfrey, Jennifer Beecham.   

Abstract

This paper describes the resource use and costs involved in supporting ventilator-dependent children and young people at home compared with those in hospital. Accommodation arrangements, patterns of service and resource use in the year prior to interview were recorded for 35 index cases aged 1-18 years using a piloted variant of the Client Services Receipt Inventory. Costs to the National Health Service (NHS), social services (excluding local authority housing costs), education (excluding basic statutory education costs), and voluntary and independent sectors were included. For each of the resources and supports used, a unit cost was calculated at 2002 prices, which was a close approximation to the long-run marginal opportunity cost. Of the 35 cases, 24 lived at home, seven were in hospital and four had transferred from hospital to home during the previous 12 months. Twelve used ventilation 24-h per day. The children and young people made intensive use of NHS services and resources. In total, the 35 cases cost just over pound 6.2 million to support during the year prior to interview; 92% of the costs were borne by the NHS. It was mostly, but not always, cheaper for children to live at home. A care package including qualified nurses and 24-h care (mean=pound 239,855 per year) was more expensive than a children's ward (mean=pound 155,158 per year), but less expensive than a long-term ventilation unit (mean=pound 301,888 per year) or an intensive care unit (mean=pound 630,388 per year), where most cases live whilst awaiting discharge. Support costs for children with complex ventilator dependency were seven times higher than those with simple ventilator dependency. These estimates provide commissioners and managers with good-quality data to inform the implementation of recently published national guidance on care for these children and young people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059493     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00639.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  9 in total

1.  The relationship between home nursing coverage, sleep, and daytime functioning in parents of ventilator-assisted children.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Deborah S Boroughs; John J Downes
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Increasing prevalence of domiciliary ventilation: changes in service demand and provision in the South West of the UK.

Authors:  Sarah Goodwin; Hayley Smith; Simon Langton Hewer; Peter Fleming; A John Henderson; Tom Hilliard; James Fraser
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Patient transitions relevant to individuals requiring ongoing ventilatory assistance: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Robert A Fowler; Roger Goldstein; Sherri Katz; David Leasa; Cheryl Pedersen; Douglas McKim
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  Hospital readmissions for newly discharged pediatric home mechanical ventilation patients.

Authors:  Sheila S Kun; Jeffrey D Edwards; Sally L Davidson Ward; Thomas G Keens
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-09-07

Review 5.  Home Mechanical Ventilation in Children.

Authors:  Aroonwan Preutthipan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Children and Young Adults Who Received Tracheostomies or Were Initiated on Long-Term Ventilation in PICUs.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Edwards; Amy J Houtrow; Adam R Lucas; Rachel L Miller; Thomas G Keens; Howard B Panitch; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Using non-invasive bi-level positive airway pressure ventilator via tracheostomy in children with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome: two case reports.

Authors:  Aroonwan Preutthipan; Teeradej Kuptanon; Harutai Kamalaporn; Anchalee Leejakpai; Malinee Nugboon; Duangrurdee Wattanasirichaigoon
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-25

8.  An updated cost-utility model for onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients and comparison with evaluation by the Institute for Clinical and Effectiveness Review (ICER).

Authors:  Rebecca Dean; Ivar Jensen; Phil Cyr; Beckley Miller; Benit Maru; Douglas M Sproule; Douglas E Feltner; Thomas Wiesner; Daniel C Malone; Matthias Bischof; Walter Toro; Omar Dabbous
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2021-02-28

9.  The 'placement' of people with profound impairments across the lifespan: re-thinking age criteria.

Authors:  Barbara E Gibson; Gillian King; Shauna Kingsnorth; Patricia McKeever
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.