AIM: To investigate doctors' response to and understanding of the legal status of advance directives. METHODS: A vignette-based study administered at palliative medicine, oncology, general practice, and geriatric medicine specialist registrar meetings (United Kingdom). Respondents determined the treatment to provide for a patient presenting with a myocardial infarction with or without an advance directive requesting maximum therapy. RESULTS: Response rate 77% (43/56). Twenty-five percent (10/40) of respondents increased the care that they would provide in response to the advance directive (p = 0.004); 77% (33/43) support/strongly support use of advance directives; 51% (22/43) did not know the legal status of advance directives; 44% found that their medical school education was not an important influence on their decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Advance directives requesting treatment can increase the level of care provided by the physician, however, most trainees chose a level of care different from that in the advance directive. Confusion exists among doctors about the legal status of advance directives, which limits their usefulness. Medical education needs to be improved to train doctors to deal with advance directives.
AIM: To investigate doctors' response to and understanding of the legal status of advance directives. METHODS: A vignette-based study administered at palliative medicine, oncology, general practice, and geriatric medicine specialist registrar meetings (United Kingdom). Respondents determined the treatment to provide for a patient presenting with a myocardial infarction with or without an advance directive requesting maximum therapy. RESULTS: Response rate 77% (43/56). Twenty-five percent (10/40) of respondents increased the care that they would provide in response to the advance directive (p = 0.004); 77% (33/43) support/strongly support use of advance directives; 51% (22/43) did not know the legal status of advance directives; 44% found that their medical school education was not an important influence on their decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Advance directives requesting treatment can increase the level of care provided by the physician, however, most trainees chose a level of care different from that in the advance directive. Confusion exists among doctors about the legal status of advance directives, which limits their usefulness. Medical education needs to be improved to train doctors to deal with advance directives.
Authors: Colleen Y Colbert; Curtis Mirkes; Paul E Ogden; Mary Elizabeth Herring; Christian Cable; John D Myers; Allison R Ownby; Eugene Boisaubin; Ida Murguia; Mark A Farnie; Mark Sadoski Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2010-06
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: H Villars; S Oustric; S Andrieu; J P Baeyens; R Bernabei; H Brodaty; K Brummel-Smith; C Celafu; N Chappell; J Fitten; G Frisoni; L Froelich; O Guerin; G Gold; I Holmerova; S Iliffe; A Lukas; R Melis; J E Morley; H Nies; F Nourhashemi; J Petermans; J Ribera Casado; L Rubenstein; A Salva; C Sieber; A Sinclair; R Schindler; E Stephan; R Y Wong; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: William Silvester; Rachael S Fullam; Ruth A Parslow; Virginia J Lewis; Rebekah Sjanta; Lynne Jackson; Vanessa White; Jane Gilchrist Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Aline De Vleminck; Dirk Houttekier; Koen Pardon; Reginald Deschepper; Chantal Van Audenhove; Robert Vander Stichele; Luc Deliens Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.581