BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the IgG antibody patterns against retinal antigens in sera of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and healthy subjects to learn more about possible immunological aspects of this disease and to identify some of the most important antigens. METHODS: Sera of 140 patients were analyzed: healthy volunteers (CO, n=101) and patients with "wet" age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n=39). The sera were tested against western blots of bovine retinal antigens. The IgG antibody patterns were analyzed by multivariate statistical techniques and some antigens were identified via LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: All patients showed complex patterns of IgG antibodies against retinal antigens. The discriminant analysis revealed a statistical significant difference between the antibody profiles of the AMD and the CO group (P=0.000023). Not only up-regulations of antigen-antibody-reactivities in the AMD group at some molecular weight ranges, e.g. at 46 and 52 kDa, could be seen, but also down-regulations, e.g. at 18 and 36 kDa. The 18 kDa antigen band was identified as alphaB-crystallin, the band at 46 kDa as alpha-enolase, and one at 52 kDa as glial fibrillary acidic protein. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate that both groups (wet AMD and CO) show complex IgG antibody patterns against retinal antigens, which are highly specific for each group. This provides further hints for the immunological basis of the disease. These changes in the antibody profiles in "wet" AMD could represent a secondary response to retinal damage or can play a causative role in the disease.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the IgG antibody patterns against retinal antigens in sera of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and healthy subjects to learn more about possible immunological aspects of this disease and to identify some of the most important antigens. METHODS: Sera of 140 patients were analyzed: healthy volunteers (CO, n=101) and patients with "wet" age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n=39). The sera were tested against western blots of bovine retinal antigens. The IgG antibody patterns were analyzed by multivariate statistical techniques and some antigens were identified via LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: All patients showed complex patterns of IgG antibodies against retinal antigens. The discriminant analysis revealed a statistical significant difference between the antibody profiles of the AMD and the CO group (P=0.000023). Not only up-regulations of antigen-antibody-reactivities in the AMD group at some molecular weight ranges, e.g. at 46 and 52 kDa, could be seen, but also down-regulations, e.g. at 18 and 36 kDa. The 18 kDa antigen band was identified as alphaB-crystallin, the band at 46 kDa as alpha-enolase, and one at 52 kDa as glial fibrillary acidic protein. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate that both groups (wet AMD and CO) show complex IgG antibody patterns against retinal antigens, which are highly specific for each group. This provides further hints for the immunological basis of the disease. These changes in the antibody profiles in "wet" AMD could represent a secondary response to retinal damage or can play a causative role in the disease.
Authors: Richard G Weleber; Robert C Watzke; William T Shults; Karmen M Trzupek; John R Heckenlively; Robert A Egan; Grazyna Adamus Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: G Sanna; M Piga; J W Terryberry; M T Peltz; S Giagheddu; L Satta; A Ahmed; A Cauli; C Montaldo; G Passiu; J B Peter; Y Shoenfeld; A Mathieu Journal: Lupus Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Sandra C Tomany; Jie Jin Wang; Redmer Van Leeuwen; Ronald Klein; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Barbara E K Klein; Wayne Smith; Paulus T V M De Jong Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Salome Murinello; Robert F Mullins; Andrew J Lotery; V Hugh Perry; Jessica L Teeling Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Austin R Fox; Emily Y Chew; Catherine Meyerle; Susan Vitale; Frederick L Ferris; Robert B Nussenblatt; H Nida Sen Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Aaron M Newman; Natasha B Gallo; Lisa S Hancox; Norma J Miller; Carolyn M Radeke; Michelle A Maloney; James B Cooper; Gregory S Hageman; Don H Anderson; Lincoln V Johnson; Monte J Radeke Journal: Genome Med Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 11.117