Literature DB >> 17056936

Full-dose aprotinin use in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an analysis of perioperative pharmacotherapy and patient outcomes.

David Royston1, Jerrold H Levy, Jane Fitch, Wulf Dietrich, Simon C Body, John M Murkin, Bruce D Spiess, Andrea Nadel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate activation of hemostasis and inflammation may contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. The serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin, has been shown to prevent tissue and organ injury in laboratory and animal studies. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the relationship of aprotinin therapy with organ dysfunction in humans undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
METHODS: Data from prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of full-dose aprotinin (2 million KIU load, 2 million KIU pump prime, and 0.5 million KIU/h continuous infusion) to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG (placebo, n = 861; aprotinin, n = 862) were examined retrospectively. Primary end-points were death, adverse cerebrovascular outcome, myocardial infarction (MI), and pharmacological interventions (inotropic drugs, vasopressors, and antiarrhythmics).
RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that relative to placebo, full-dose aprotinin therapy was associated with significant effects on the incidence of adverse cerebrovascular outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.93; P = 0.03) and use of inotropic drugs (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97; P = 0.02), vasopressors (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.90; P < 0.01), and antiarrhythmics (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; P = 0.02), but not death (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.54-1.85; P = 1.0) or MI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.64-1.31; P = 0.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed results of univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of data collected from prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in CABG shows that full-dose aprotinin use was associated with a lower risk of adverse cerebrovascular outcomes and a reduced need for use of vasoactive drugs; the risk of death and perioperative MI was not affected by aprotinin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056936     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000238447.74029.f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is there still a role for aprotinin in cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Neel R Sodha; Munir Boodhwani; Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Safety of low-dose aprotinin in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a single-centre investigation in 2,436 patients in Germany.

Authors:  Mario Kluth; Jan U Lueth; Armin Zittermann; Markus Lanzenstiel; Reiner Koerfer; Kazuo Inoue
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Antifibrinolytic agents: aprotinin, and desmopressin.

Authors:  Pramila Bajaj
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  Antifibrinolytics and cardiac surgery: The past, the present, and the future.

Authors:  Naresh K Aggarwal; Arun Subramanian
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

5.  Low dose aprotinin increases mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery(*).

Authors:  Feridoun Sabzi; Gholam Reza Moradi; Heidar Dadkhah; Alireza Poormotaabed; Samsam Dabiri
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Beneficial effects of ulinastatin on gut barrier function in sepsis.

Authors:  Longyuan Jiang; Lianhong Yang; Meng Zhang; Xiangshao Fang; Zitong Huang; Zhengfei Yang; Tianen Zhou
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.