Literature DB >> 17056898

Radiology reporting: returning to our image-centric roots.

Bruce Reiner1, Eliot Siegel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite extraordinary advances in imaging and information technologies, the form and content of radiology reporting has changed little in the discipline's more than 100-year history. In this commentary, we outline the challenges that have confronted innovations such as speech recognition and structured reporting and call for a radical rethinking of the reporting process. By combining new applications with the expanding power of radiology and hospital information systems, the attention of the radiologist--and his or her referring colleagues--could be more focused on the image and its meaning.
CONCLUSION: One promising result of such a change in focus could be improved and more reliable communication, already an area of heightened concern in the imaging community. Moreover, such a shift away from the printed word to image-centered content could lead to benefits in shared image viewing; more streamlined and timely reporting; data mining of aggregate results; and image archives, and, ultimately, enhancement of the consultative value of the radiologist's contribution to patient care and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056898     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The role of key image notes in CT imaging study interpretation.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Fan; Zhe Xu; Hai-Qing He; Jian-Rong Ding; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Customization of medical report data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis part 3: creation of a standardized image-centric mark-up and annotation tool.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Visual Interpretation with Three-Dimensional Annotations (VITA): three-dimensional image interpretation tool for radiological reporting.

Authors:  Sharmili Roy; Michael S Brown; George L Shih
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication : part 4: quality assurance and education.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Tomi Kauppinen; Mika P Koivikko; Juhani Ahovuo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation.

Authors:  Gautam S Muralidhar; Gary J Whitman; Tamara Miner Haygood; Tanya W Stephens; Alan C Bovik; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  The nuclear cardiology report: problems, predictors, and improvement. A report from the ICANL database.

Authors:  Peter L Tilkemeier; Eva R Serber; Mary Beth Farrell
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion, part II: practical applications.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.