Literature DB >> 17056083

Sound speed correction in ultrasound imaging.

David Napolitano1, Ching-Hua Chou, Glen McLaughlin, Ting-Lan Ji, Larry Mo, Derek DeBusschere, Robert Steins.   

Abstract

A constant sound speed of 1.54 mm/micros is generally used by ultrasound imaging systems for delay and timing. However, the body's sound speed in-homogeneity can lead to defocusing and increased clutter. To provide an improvement using standard transducers, the sound speed used in delay and timing was computed using different sound speeds. We observed improvement in lateral resolution and clutter in phantom, OB, abdominal, and breast imaging. In OB and abdominal imaging using a 4 MHz curved array, 1.48 mm/micros provided higher image quality in many situations. In breast with an 8 MHz linear array, 1.44 mm/micros provided better images in some cases. To provide an automated way to determine and adjust the sound speed used by the imaging system, an algorithm was developed that determines the sound speed that produces the best overall lateral image quality by analyzing the spatial frequency content in a single B-mode frame of channel data using images reconstructed using various trial sound speeds. The metric produced correlates well with the observed best lateral image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056083     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.06.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Average sound speed estimation using speckle analysis of medical ultrasound data.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Takashi Azuma; Jack T Liang; Yoshikazu Nakajima
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Ultrasound attenuation measurements using a reference phantom with sound speed mismatch.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Nicholas C Rubert; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 3.  Spatial Coherence in Medical Ultrasound: A Review.

Authors:  James Long; Gregg Trahey; Nick Bottenus
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Reconstruction algorithm for improved ultrasound image quality.

Authors:  Bruno Madore; F Can Meral
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Refraction correction in 3D transcranial ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 6.  Advances in ultrasonography: image formation and quality assessment.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  Basic concept and clinical applications of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technologies.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Effect of using different U/S probe Standoff materials in image geometry for interventional procedures: the example of prostate.

Authors:  Stefanos Diamantopoulos; Natasa Milickovic; Saeed Butt; Zaira Katsilieri; Vasiliki Kefala; Pawel Zogal; George Sakas; Dimos Baltas
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-12-30

9.  Feasibility of newly developed endoscopic ultrasound with zone sonography technology for diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Yuya Itoh; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hajime Sumi; Daijiro Hayashi; Naoki Ohmiya; Ryoji Miyahara; Masanao Nakamura; Kohei Funasaka; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoshiaki Katano; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 10.  Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Amir M Pirmoazen; Aman Khurana; Ahmed El Kaffas; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.