Literature DB >> 17055946

Amniotic-fluid embolism and medical induction of labour: a retrospective, population-based cohort study.

Michael S Kramer1, Jocelyn Rouleau, Thomas F Baskett, K S Joseph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amniotic-fluid embolism is a rare, but serious and often fatal maternal complication of delivery, of which the cause is unknown. We undertook an epidemiological study to investigate the association between amniotic-fluid embolism and medical induction of labour.
METHODS: We used a population-based cohort of 3 million hospital deliveries in Canada between 1991 and 2002 to assess the associations between overall and fatal rates of amniotic-fluid embolism and medical and surgical induction, maternal age, fetal presentation, mode of delivery, and pregnancy and labour complications.
FINDINGS: Total rate of amniotic-fluid embolism was 14.8 per 100,000 multiple-birth deliveries and 6.0 per 100,000 singleton deliveries (odds ratio 2.5 [95% CI 0.9-6.2]). Of the 180 cases of amniotic-fluid embolism in women with singleton deliveries during the study period, 24 (13%) were fatal. We saw no significant temporal increase in occurrence of amniotic-fluid embolism for total or fatal cases. Medical induction of labour nearly doubled the risk of overall cases of amniotic-fluid embolism (adjusted odds ratio 1.8 [1.3-2.7]), and the association was stronger for fatal cases (crude odds ratio 3.5 [1.5-8.4]). Maternal age of 35 years or older, caesarean or instrumental vaginal delivery, polyhydramnios, cervical laceration or uterine rupture, placenta previa or abruption, eclampsia, and fetal distress were also associated with an increased risk.
INTERPRETATION: Medical induction of labour seems to increase the risk of amniotic-fluid embolism. Although the absolute excess risk is low, women and physicians should be aware of this risk when making decisions about elective labour induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17055946     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69607-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  23 in total

1.  Amniotic Fluid Embolism (AFE) in China: Are maternal mortality and morbidity preventable?

Authors:  Xiuting Mo; Aihua Feng; Xiaoyan Liu; Ruoyan Gai Tobe
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2014-08

2.  Successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a postpartum patient with amniotic fluid embolism.

Authors:  Gil Myeong Seong; Su Wan Kim; Hye Sim Kang; Hyun Wook Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Care practice #1: labor begins on its own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

4.  Amniotic Fluid Embolism with Isolated Coagulopathy: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Liao; Fuh-Jinn Luo
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Russell Eric Dawe; Jessica Bishop; Amanda Pendergast; Susan Avery; Kelly Monaghan; Norah Duggan; Kris Aubrey-Bassler
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 6.  Pathophysiology, clinics and diagnostics of non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Martina Montagnana; Gianfranco Cervellin; Massimo Franchini; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Polyhydramnios: Causes, Diagnosis and Therapy.

Authors:  A Hamza; D Herr; E F Solomayer; G Meyberg-Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Forensic aspects of post-mortem histological detection of amniotic fluid embolism.

Authors:  I Sinicina; H Pankratz; K Bise; E Matevossian
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 9.  Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Agustín Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable.

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Richard M Cullen; Alvin Simms; Shabnam Asghari; Joan Crane; Peizhong Peter Wang; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.