BACKGROUND: In response to concerns about the availability and quality of women's health services in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in the early 1990s, Congress approved landmark legislation earmarking funds to enhance women's health services. A portion of the appropriation was used to launch Comprehensive Women's Health Centers as exemplars for the development of VA women's health care throughout the system. We report on the diffusion and characteristics of VA women's health clinics (WHCs) 10 years later. METHODS: In 2001, we surveyed the senior women's health clinician at each VA medical center serving > or =400 women veterans (83% response rate) regarding their internal organizational characteristics in relation to factors associated with organizational innovation (centralization, complexity, formalization, interconnectedness, organizational slack, size). We evaluated the comparability of WHCs (n = 66) with characteristics of the original comprehensive women's health centers (CWHCs; n = 8). RESULTS: Gender-specific service availability in WHCs was comparable to that of CWHCs with important exceptions in mental health, mammography and osteoporosis management. WHCs were less likely to have same-gender providers (p < .05), women's health training programs (p < .01), separate women's mental health clinics (p < .001), separate space (p < .05), or adequate privacy (p < .05); however, they were less likely to have experienced educational program closures (p < .001) and staffing losses (p < .05) compared to CWHCs. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion of comprehensive women's health care is as yet incomplete. More research is needed to examine the quality of care associated with these models and to establish the business case for managers faced with small female patient caseloads.
BACKGROUND: In response to concerns about the availability and quality of women's health services in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in the early 1990s, Congress approved landmark legislation earmarking funds to enhance women's health services. A portion of the appropriation was used to launch Comprehensive Women's Health Centers as exemplars for the development of VA women's health care throughout the system. We report on the diffusion and characteristics of VA women's health clinics (WHCs) 10 years later. METHODS: In 2001, we surveyed the senior women's health clinician at each VA medical center serving > or =400 women veterans (83% response rate) regarding their internal organizational characteristics in relation to factors associated with organizational innovation (centralization, complexity, formalization, interconnectedness, organizational slack, size). We evaluated the comparability of WHCs (n = 66) with characteristics of the original comprehensive women's health centers (CWHCs; n = 8). RESULTS: Gender-specific service availability in WHCs was comparable to that of CWHCs with important exceptions in mental health, mammography and osteoporosis management. WHCs were less likely to have same-gender providers (p < .05), women's health training programs (p < .01), separate women's mental health clinics (p < .001), separate space (p < .05), or adequate privacy (p < .05); however, they were less likely to have experienced educational program closures (p < .001) and staffing losses (p < .05) compared to CWHCs. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion of comprehensive women's health care is as yet incomplete. More research is needed to examine the quality of care associated with these models and to establish the business case for managers faced with small female patient caseloads.
Authors: Kristina M Cordasco; Jessica L Zuchowski; Alison B Hamilton; Susan Kirsh; Laure Veet; Joann O Saavedra; Lisa Altman; Herschel Knapp; Mark Canning; Donna L Washington Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Lori Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Melissa Skanderson; Heather Allore; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Natalya C Maisel; Vera Gaetano; Steven Wright; Sally Haskell; Cynthia Brandt Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Claire Than; Emmeline Chuang; Donna L Washington; Jack Needleman; Ismelda Canelo; Lisa S Meredith; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2020-02-22
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Maria K Mor; Nichole K Bayliss; Xiangyan Xu; Michael J Fine Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Megan M Kelly; Dawne S Vogt; Emily M Scheiderer; Paige Ouimette; Jennifer Daley; Jessica Wolfe Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mona Duggal; Joseph L Goulet; Julie Womack; Kirsha Gordon; Kristin Mattocks; Sally G Haskell; Amy C Justice; Cynthia A Brandt Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 2.655