Literature DB >> 17055256

Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance.

Emad A Rakha1, Dalia Abd El-Rehim, Claire Paish, Andrew R Green, Andrew H S Lee, John F Robertson, Roger W Blamey, Douglas Macmillan, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is recognised to be a heterogeneous disease with a range of morphological appearances and behaviours. The recently recognised basal phenotype (BP) is associated with poor survival, but the clinical implications of this class of breast cancers remain to be adequately defined.
METHODS: We have examined a well-characterised series of 1872 invasive breast carcinomas with a long term follow-up to assess the clinical significance of BP.
RESULTS: A pragmatic definition of the BP as immunophenotypic evidence of basal cytokeratins CK5/6 and/or CK14 expression was used. These tumours were associated with shorter overall survival and disease-free interval in our series as a whole and in both the lymph node (LN) negative and LN positive subgroups. When stratified by histological grade, BP was of highly significant prognostic value in grade 3 but not in grades 1 or 2 tumours. Similarly, it was associated with poor survival in the moderate group of the Nottingham prognostic Index but not in the other groups. In a subgroup comprising LN negative grade 3 tumours, BP was the most powerful prognostic marker followed only by tumour size, while the other variables were non-significant. Patients with BP were more likely to respond to chemotherapy than those with non-basal tumours.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide robust evidence that BP is an important class of breast cancers with a particularly aggressive behaviour in patients with LN negative grade 3 disease. We recommend routine identification of BP in breast cancer and the development of effective adjuvant treatment strategies. These are important observations as these tumours typically lack hormone receptor and HER-2 overexpression limiting the range of relevant adjuvant therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17055256     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  63 in total

1.  Expression of SIRT1 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in both operable triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Minqing Wu; Weidong Wei; Xiangsheng Xiao; Jiaoli Guo; Xinhua Xie; Laisheng Li; Yanan Kong; Ning Lv; Weihua Jia; Yin Zhang; Xiaoming Xie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The expression and clinical significance of the androgen receptor and E-cadherin in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Dabei Tang; Shanqi Xu; Qingyuan Zhang; Wenhui Zhao
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Reproductive history and risk of three breast cancer subtypes defined by three biomarkers.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Diana S M Buist; Kathleen E Malone; William E Barlow; Peggy L Porter; Karla Kerlikowske; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Loss of stromal caveolin-1 expression predicts poor clinical outcome in triple negative and basal-like breast cancers.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Abhijit Dasgupta; Sara Sammons; Ozlem Er; Magdalena B Potoczek; Fran Guiles; Federica Sotgia; Jonathan R Brody; Edith P Mitchell; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Mammary tumors initiated by constitutive Cdk2 activation contain an invasive basal-like component.

Authors:  Patrick E Corsino; Bradley J Davis; Peter H Nørgaard; Nicole N Teoh Parker; Mary Law; William Dunn; Brian K Law
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Body size and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A case-control study of reproductive factors associated with subtypes of breast cancer in Northeast China.

Authors:  Peng Xing; Jiguang Li; Feng Jin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Identification of molecular phenotypes in canine mammary carcinomas with clinical implications: application of the human classification.

Authors:  A Gama; A Alves; F Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Breast cancer survival in African-American women by hormone receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Justin Xavier Moore; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in two prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Lawrence H Kushi; Erin Weltzien; Benjamin Maring; Susan E Kutner; Regan S Fulton; Marion M Lee; Christine B Ambrosone; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.