Literature DB >> 1705521

Difference in central projection of primary afferents innervating facial and intraoral structures in the rat.

M Takemura1, T Sugimoto, Y Shigenaga.   

Abstract

Transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase-wheat germ agglutinin conjugate was used to study the central projection of primary afferent neurons innervating facial and intraoral structures. The examined primary neurons innervating the facial structures were those comprising the frontal and zygomaticofacial nerves and those innervating the cornea, while the primary neurons innervating the intraoral structures included those innervating the mandibular incisor and molar tooth pulps and those comprising the palatine nerve. The primary afferents innervating the facial structures project to the lateral or ventral parts of the trigeminal principal, oral and interpolar subnuclei, and to the rostral cervical spinal dorsal horn across laminae I through V, with a greater proportion being directed to the spinal dorsal horn. The primary afferents innervating the intraoral structures terminate in the dorsomedial subdivisions of the trigeminal principal, oral and interpolar subnuclei, and in laminae I, II, and V of the medial medullary dorsal horn, with a much denser projection being distributed to the rostral subnuclei. In addition to the above brain stem trigeminal sensory nuclear complex, they project to the supratrigeminal nucleus, caudal solitary tract nucleus, and paratrigeminal nucleus. These observations agree with previously reported data that the central projection of trigeminal nerve is organized in different manners for the facial and intraoral structures. Furthermore, the present findings in conjunction with our previous studies clarify that the central projection of primary afferents from the facial skin is organized in a clear somatotopic fashion and that the terminal fields of primary afferents from the intraoral structures extensively overlap in the brain stem trigeminal nuclear complex particularly in its rostral subdivisions. The central mechanism of trigeminal nociception is discussed with particular respect to its difference between the facial and intraoral structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1705521     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(91)90099-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  21 in total

1.  The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology.

Authors:  Fiona Stapleton; Carl Marfurt; Blanka Golebiowski; Mark Rosenblatt; David Bereiter; Carolyn Begley; Darlene Dartt; Juana Gallar; Carlos Belmonte; Pedram Hamrah; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The composition and central projections of the internal auricular nerves of the dog.

Authors:  C H Chien; J Y Shieh; E A Ling; C K Tan; C Y Wen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  The role of sensory fiber demography in trigeminal and postherpetic neuralgias.

Authors:  A F DaSilva; M F DosSantos
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Morphine administered in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis inhibits nociceptive activities in the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis.

Authors:  R Dallel; C Dualé; J L Molat
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Trigemino-gustatory interactions: a randomized controlled clinical trial assessing the effects of selective anesthesia of dental afferents on taste thresholds.

Authors:  Papa Abdou Lecor; Babacar Touré; Yves Boucher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Fos protein-like immunoreactive neurons induced by electrical stimulation in the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex of rats with chronically injured peripheral nerve.

Authors:  Naoko Fujisawa; Ryuji Terayama; Daisuke Yamaguchi; Shinji Omura; Takashi Yamashiro; Tomosada Sugimoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Distinct central representations for sensory fibers innervating either the conjunctiva or cornea of the rat.

Authors:  W Michael Panneton; Hugo Hsu; Qi Gan
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms underlying somatic tinnitus.

Authors:  Susan Shore; Jianxun Zhou; Seth Koehler
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 9.  Cross-modal interactions of auditory and somatic inputs in the brainstem and midbrain and their imbalance in tinnitus and deafness.

Authors:  S Dehmel; Y L Cui; S E Shore
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  P2X2 Receptor Terminal Field Demarcates a "Transition Zone" for Gustatory and Mechanosensory Processing in the Mouse Nucleus Tractus Solitarius.

Authors:  Joseph M Breza; Susan P Travers
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.