Jing-Lin Zhao1, Yue-Jin Yang, Shi-Jie You, Chuan-Jue Cui, Run-Lin Gao. 1. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu-Wai Heart Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Bei Li Shi Road 167, West City District, Beijing 100037, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Postconditioning with multiple very short coronary occlusions immediately after prolonged ischemia has been found to reduce infarction size. However, it remains unknown whether postconditioning under the normal or hypercholesterolemic condition can also reduce myocardial no-reflow for which endothelial dysfunction is an important mechanism. METHODS:Twenty-four normal mini-swines were randomized into 3 study groups: 8 in control, 8 in postconditioning, 8 in sham-operated group. Twenty-four hypercholesterolemic mini-swines were also randomized into 3 study groups: 8 in control, 8 in postconditioning, 8 in sham-operated group. Acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion model was created with 3 h occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by two-hour reperfusion. Coronary ligation area (LA) and area of no-reflow were determined with pathological means (Path). RESULTS: Compared with the normal control group, postconditioning under the normal condition significantly improved endothelial function, decreased area of no-reflow (Path: from 81.3+/-3.9% to 54.3+/-3.69% of LA, P<0.01) and reduced necrosis area from 98.5+/-2.35% to 76.1+/-5.6% of LA (P<0.05-0.01). However, compared with the normal control group, postconditioning under the hypercholesterolemic condition did not significantly modify endothelial function, area of no-reflow and necrosis area (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that postconditioning under the normal condition can reduce the area of no-reflow and necrosis area, while postconditioning under the hypercholesterolemic condition cannot. The beneficial effect of postconditioning on myocardial no-reflow could be due to its protection of endothelial function.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Postconditioning with multiple very short coronary occlusions immediately after prolonged ischemia has been found to reduce infarction size. However, it remains unknown whether postconditioning under the normal or hypercholesterolemic condition can also reduce myocardial no-reflow for which endothelial dysfunction is an important mechanism. METHODS: Twenty-four normal mini-swines were randomized into 3 study groups: 8 in control, 8 in postconditioning, 8 in sham-operated group. Twenty-four hypercholesterolemic mini-swines were also randomized into 3 study groups: 8 in control, 8 in postconditioning, 8 in sham-operated group. Acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion model was created with 3 h occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by two-hour reperfusion. Coronary ligation area (LA) and area of no-reflow were determined with pathological means (Path). RESULTS: Compared with the normal control group, postconditioning under the normal condition significantly improved endothelial function, decreased area of no-reflow (Path: from 81.3+/-3.9% to 54.3+/-3.69% of LA, P<0.01) and reduced necrosis area from 98.5+/-2.35% to 76.1+/-5.6% of LA (P<0.05-0.01). However, compared with the normal control group, postconditioning under the hypercholesterolemic condition did not significantly modify endothelial function, area of no-reflow and necrosis area (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that postconditioning under the normal condition can reduce the area of no-reflow and necrosis area, while postconditioning under the hypercholesterolemic condition cannot. The beneficial effect of postconditioning on myocardial no-reflow could be due to its protection of endothelial function.
Authors: Derek J Hausenloy; William Chilian; Filippo Crea; Sean M Davidson; Peter Ferdinandy; David Garcia-Dorado; Niels van Royen; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Fawzi A Babiker; Ilka Lorenzen-Schmidt; Eric Mokelke; Ward Y Vanagt; Tammo Delhaas; Johannes Waltenberger; Jack P Cleutjens; Frits W Prinzen Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Robert M Osipov; Cesario Bianchi; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Yuhong Liu; Michael P Robich; Hilary P Glazer; Neel R Sodha; Frank W Sellke Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert M Osipov; Michael P Robich; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Yuhong Liu; Hilary P Glazer; John Wagstaff; Cesario Bianchi; Frank W Sellke Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-04-16
Authors: Sauri Hernández-Reséndiz; Mónica Muñoz-Vega; Whendy E Contreras; Gustavo E Crespo-Avilan; Julian Rodriguez-Montesinos; Oscar Arias-Carrión; Oscar Pérez-Méndez; William A Boisvert; Klaus T Preissner; Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes Journal: Cond Med Date: 2018-08