AIMS: To determine the prognosis of patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, 6 years after screening for silent myocardial ischaemia (SMI). METHODS: Two hundred and three asymptomatic patients with diabetes underwent systematic SMI screening. From the results of this screening, they were allocated to one of three groups: patients (n = 171) with negative screening; patients (n = 32) with positive screening; and patients (n = 21) with positive screening and coronary stenosis. Six years after the initial assessment, all patients were re-assessed. All events [death, cardiac death, non-fatal major cardiac events (NFMCEs)--acute myocardial infarction, ventricular rhythm disorders, heart failure, unstable angina] were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Patients (n = 20) with positive SMI screening and coronary stenosis had a higher risk of NFMCEs (35% vs. 7%, P < 0.001), and a higher mortality rate (35% vs. 15%, P < 0.05) compared with patients (n = 157) with negative screening. SMI-positive patients (n = 31) had a higher NFMCE rate compared with negative SMI screening patients, although overall mortality rate was no different. Cancer was the leading cause of death (36.4%). In multivariate analysis, major cardiac events (cardiac death and NFMCE) were related to baseline age, body mass index and coronary stenosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and SMI have a very poor prognosis as assessed by cardiac events or death, especially in the presence of coronary stenosis.
AIMS: To determine the prognosis of patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, 6 years after screening for silent myocardial ischaemia (SMI). METHODS: Two hundred and three asymptomatic patients with diabetes underwent systematic SMI screening. From the results of this screening, they were allocated to one of three groups: patients (n = 171) with negative screening; patients (n = 32) with positive screening; and patients (n = 21) with positive screening and coronary stenosis. Six years after the initial assessment, all patients were re-assessed. All events [death, cardiac death, non-fatal major cardiac events (NFMCEs)--acute myocardial infarction, ventricular rhythm disorders, heart failure, unstable angina] were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Patients (n = 20) with positive SMI screening and coronary stenosis had a higher risk of NFMCEs (35% vs. 7%, P < 0.001), and a higher mortality rate (35% vs. 15%, P < 0.05) compared with patients (n = 157) with negative screening. SMI-positive patients (n = 31) had a higher NFMCE rate compared with negative SMI screening patients, although overall mortality rate was no different. Cancer was the leading cause of death (36.4%). In multivariate analysis, major cardiac events (cardiac death and NFMCE) were related to baseline age, body mass index and coronary stenosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with diabetes and SMI have a very poor prognosis as assessed by cardiac events or death, especially in the presence of coronary stenosis.