Literature DB >> 17054565

Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness.

Retta Andresen1, Peter Caputi, Lindsay Oades.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In order to realize the vision of recovery-orientated mental health services, there is a need for a model and a method of measuring recovery as the concept is described by mental health consumers. A preliminary five-stage model based on consumer accounts was developed in an earlier study by the authors. This next stage of the research program describes the development and initial testing of a stage measure which, when validated, can be used in testing that model.
METHOD: Existing measures of recovery were reviewed to assess their concordance with the model, and a new measure, the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI) was subsequently developed. A postal survey was conducted of 94 volunteers from the NISAD Schizophrenia Research Register. Participants completed the STORI and measures of mental health, psychological wellbeing, hope, resilience and recovery.
RESULTS: The STORI correlated with all of the psychological health variables, and the five stage subscales were found to be internally consistent. An ordinal relationship between the stage subscales was demonstrated by the intercorrelations of the subscale scores and the pattern of correlations between the subscales and the other measures. However, a cluster analysis of items revealed an overlap in measurement of adjacent stages, with only three clear clusters emerging.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide preliminary empirical validation of the STORI as a measure of the consumer definition of recovery. However, refinement of the measure is needed to improve its capacity to discriminate between the stages of the model. The model could then be comprehensively tested using longitudinal methods and the inclusion of objective measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17054565     DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01921.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  52 in total

Review 1.  Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries.

Authors:  Carolyn Doughty; Samson Tse
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-05-29

2.  Validation of the Recovery Assessment Scale for Chinese in recovery of mental illness in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Winnie W S Mak; Randolph C H Chan; Sania S W Yau
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The responses of young people to their experiences of first-episode psychosis: harnessing resilience.

Authors:  Anthony R Henderson; Alan Cock
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2014-07-27

4.  The professional experiences of peer specialists in the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network.

Authors:  Anthony O Ahmed; Kristin M Hunter; Alex P Mabe; Sherry J Tucker; Peter F Buckley
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-02-28

5.  Comparing Educational Music Therapy Interventions via Stages of Recovery with Adults in an Acute Care Mental Health Setting: A Cluster-Randomized Pilot Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Michael J Silverman
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2019-02-23

Review 6.  Health behavior models for informing digital technology interventions for individuals with mental illness.

Authors:  John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Sunny Jung Kim; Gregory J McHugo; Jürgen Unützer; Stephen J Bartels; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Issues and developments on the consumer recovery construct.

Authors:  Alan S Bellack; Amy Drapalski
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  Measuring the later stages of the recovery journey: insights gained from clubhouse members.

Authors:  Nicola Hancock; Anita Bundy; Anne Honey; Stephanie Helich; Sally Tamsett
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-07-24

9.  Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.

Authors:  Bernd Puschner; Sabine Steffen; Mike Slade; Helena Kaliniecka; Mario Maj; Andrea Fiorillo; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Jens Ivar Larsen; Anikó Egerházi; Zoltan Nemes; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Thomas Becker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Patterns of recovery from severe mental illness: a pilot study of outcomes.

Authors:  Leonard Miller; Timothy T Brown; David Pilon; Richard M Scheffler; Monica Davis
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.