Literature DB >> 17054261

Antidotes for acute cardenolide (cardiac glycoside) poisoning.

D M Roberts1, N A Buckley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardenolides are naturally occurring plant toxins which act primarily on the heart. While poisoning with the digitalis cardenolides (digoxin and digitoxin) are reported worldwide, cardiotoxicity from other cardenolides such as the yellow oleander are also a major problem, with tens of thousands of cases of poisoning each year in South Asia. Because cardenolides from these plants are structurally similar, acute poisonings are managed using similar treatments. The benefit of these treatments is of interest, particularly in the context of cost since most poisonings occur in developing countries where resources are very limited.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of antidotes for the treatment of acute cardenolide poisoning, in particular atropine, isoprenaline (isoproterenol), multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC), fructose-1,6-diphosphate, sodium bicarbonate, magnesium, phenytoin and anti-digoxin Fab antitoxin. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Controlled Trials Register of the Cochrane Collaboration, Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology, Info Trac, www.google.com.au, and Science Citation Index of studies identified by the previous searches. We manually searched the bibliographies of identified articles and personally contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials where antidotes were administered to patients with acute symptomatic cardenolide poisoning were identified. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data on study design, including the method of randomisation, participant characteristics, type of intervention and outcomes from each study. We independently assessed methodological quality of the included studies. A pooled analysis was not appropriate. MAIN
RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials were identified, both were conducted in patients with yellow oleander poisoning. One trial investigated the effect of MDAC on mortality, the relative risk (RR) was 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 0.83) indicating a beneficial effect. The second study found a beneficial effect of anti-digoxin Fab antitoxin on the presence of cardiac dysrhythmias at two hours post-administration; the RR was 0.60 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.81). Other benefits were also noted in both studies and serious adverse effects were minimal. Studies assessing the effect of antidotes on other cardenolides were not identified. One ongoing study investigating the activated charcoal for acute yellow oleander self-poisoning was also identified. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence to suggest that MDAC and anti-digoxin Fab antitoxin may be effective treatments for yellow oleander poisoning. However, the efficacy and indications of these interventions for the treatment of acute digitalis poisoning is uncertain due to the lack of good quality controlled clinical trials. Given pharmacokinetic differences between individual cardenolides, the effect of antidotes administered to patients with yellow oleander poisoning cannot be readily translated to those of other cardenolides. Unfortunately cost limits the use of antidotes such as anti-digoxin Fab antitoxin in developing countries where cardenolide poisonings are frequent. More research is required using relatively cheap antidotes which may also be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17054261      PMCID: PMC8889883          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005490.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  26 in total

1.  Deaths due to absence of an affordable antitoxin for plant poisoning.

Authors:  Michael Eddleston; Lalith Senarathna; Fahim Mohamed; Nick Buckley; Edmund Juszczak; M H Rezvi Sheriff; Ariaranee Ariaratnam; Senaka Rajapakse; David Warrell; K Rajakanthan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The use of digoxin-specific Fab fragments for severe digitalis intoxication in children.

Authors:  A D Woolf; T Wenger; T W Smith; F H Lovejoy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Anti-digoxin Fab fragments in cardiotoxicity induced by ingestion of yellow oleander: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Eddleston; S Rajapakse; S Jayalath; L Sjöström; W Santharaj; P N Thenabadu; M H Sheriff; D A Warrell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Pharmacokinetics of digoxin cross-reacting substances in patients with acute yellow Oleander (Thevetia peruviana) poisoning, including the effect of activated charcoal.

Authors:  Darren M Roberts; Emma Southcott; Julia M Potter; Michael S Roberts; Michael Eddleston; Nick A Buckley
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Clinical features and management of digitalis poisoning--rationale for immunotherapy.

Authors:  P Taboulet; F J Baud; C Bismuth
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  1993

6.  [Report of experiences in the treatment of 16 cases of severe glycoside poisoning with digitalis antibody fragments (Fab)].

Authors:  A Smolarz; E Roesch; H Lenz; P Neubert; U Abshagen
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1984-02

7.  Effect of administration of activated charcoal and fibre on absorption, excretion and steady state blood levels of digoxin and digitoxin. Evidence for intestinal secretion of the glycosides.

Authors:  P Reissell; V Manninen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1982

8.  Treatment of 63 severely digitalis-toxic patients with digoxin-specific antibody fragments.

Authors:  T L Wenger; V P Butler; E Haber; T W Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Results of multicenter studies of digoxin-specific antibody fragments in managing digitalis intoxication in the pediatric population.

Authors:  A D Woolf; T L Wenger; T W Smith; F H Lovejoy
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Experience with digoxin immune Fab (ovine) in patients with renal impairment.

Authors:  T L Wenger
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.469

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological treatment of cardiac glycoside poisoning.

Authors:  Darren M Roberts; Gamini Gallapatthy; Asunga Dunuwille; Betty S Chan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Two cases of cardiac glycoside poisoning from accidental foxglove ingestion.

Authors:  Renée M Janssen; Mattias Berg; Daniel H Ovakim
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Eating seeds from the 'be still' tree, yet having lucky nut poisoning: a case of acute yellow oleander poisoning.

Authors:  Emilio Fentanes
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Poisoning by Plants.

Authors:  Sebastian Wendt; Christoph Lübbert; Kathrin Begemann; Dagmar Prasa; Heike Franke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 8.251

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in clinical toxicology: clinical applications.

Authors:  Darren M Roberts; Nick A Buckley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Retrospective evaluation of patients with elevated digoxin levels at an emergency department.

Authors:  Gulsum Limon; Gurkan Ersoy; Nese Colak Oray; Basak Bayram; Onder Limon
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-14

7.  Fatality Following Intentional Ingestion of Cerbera odollam Seeds.

Authors:  Ryan Misek; Glenn Allen; Valerie LeComte; Nicholas Mazur
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.