Literature DB >> 17054237

Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

L Yi1, B Jingping, J Gele, X Baoleri, W Taixiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal burst fractures result from the failure of both the anterior and the middle columns of the spine under axial compression loads. Conservative management is through bed rest, and immobilization with a brace once the acute symptoms have settled. Surgical treatment involves either anterior or posterior stabilization of the fracture with screws, often with decompression, an operation to remove bone fragments which have intruded into the vertebral canal.
OBJECTIVES: To compare operative with non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register (May 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (January 1988 to April 2005), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) available at http://cbm.imicams.ac.cn (January 1978 to April 2005). We also searched reference lists of articles, handsearched journals and conference proceedings, and contacted authors where necessary. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing operative with non-operative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. Pooling of data was not carried out as only one small, poor quality trial was included. MAIN
RESULTS: We included one trial comparing operative with non-operative treatment (53 participants). There was no statistically significant difference in pain and function-related outcomes, rates of return to work, radiographic findings or average length of hospitalization at final follow up. The rate of complications was higher for the patients treated operatively. The degree of kyphosis or the percentage of correction lost did not correlate with any clinical symptoms at the time of the final follow up. Average costs related to hospitalization and treatment in the operative group appeared to be more than in the non-operative group. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference on the functional outcome two years or more after therapy between operative and non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. However, this review was able to include only one randomized controlled trial with a small sample size and poor quality, which precluded firm conclusions. More research with high quality trials is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17054237     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005079.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  29 in total

1.  What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about Conservative versus Surgical Management?

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Mid-term results of PLIF/TLIF in trauma.

Authors:  Rene Schmid; Dietmar Krappinger; Michael Blauth; Anton Kathrein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Demineralization after balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement: a histological evaluation in ten patients.

Authors:  Rainer Gumpert; Koppany Bodo; Ekkehard Spuller; Thomas Poglitsch; Ronny Bindl; Anita Ignatius; Paul Puchwein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Experimentally induced incomplete burst fractures - a novel technique for calf and human specimens.

Authors:  René Hartensuer; Adam Gasch; Dominic Gehweiler; Steffen Schanz; Martin Schulze; Lars Matuszewski; Martin Langer; Michael J Raschke; Thomas Vordemvenne
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Percutaneous short fixation vs conservative treatment: comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcome for A.3 burst fractures of thoraco-lumbar junction and lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Landi; N Marotta; C Mancarella; M C Meluzio; A Pietrantonio; R Delfini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sonali R Gnanenthiran; Sam Adie; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.

Authors:  Byung-Guk Kim; Jin-Myoung Dan; Dong-Eun Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-02-13

8.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column: Part III: Follow up data].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Traumatology of the spine].

Authors:  C W Müller; T Hüfner; T Gösling; C Krettek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.