BACKGROUND: More than 50% of patients with esophageal cancer have metastatic disease at presentation. The use of chemotherapy for this patient group is increasing with the intention of local and distant tumor control, improving quality of life and prolongation of survival. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a) chemotherapy versus best supportive care or b) different chemotherapy regimes against each other, in metastatic esophageal carcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials--CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2004) MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004), EMBASE (1980 to February 2004) and Cancerlit. Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. The search was updated in February 2005 and February 2006. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care, or different chemotherapy regimes against each other in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (MYVH/EJK) extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted to obtain subgroup results of patients with metastatic esophageal carcinoma. MAIN RESULTS: Only two RCTs with a total of 42 participants compared chemotherapy with best supportive care for metastatic esophageal cancer. No survival benefit was shown for chemotherapy treatment in these RCTs. Five RCTs with a total of 1242 participants compared different chemotherapy regimes. Due to variation in patient population and chemotherapy regimes, it was not possible to perform a formal pooled analysis. There was no consistent benefit of any specific chemotherapy regimen. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for well designed, adequately powered, phase III trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Chemotherapy agents with promising response rates and tolerable toxicity are cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), paclitaxel and antracyclins. Future trials comparing palliative treatment modalities should assess quality of life with validated quality of life measures.
BACKGROUND: More than 50% of patients with esophageal cancer have metastatic disease at presentation. The use of chemotherapy for this patient group is increasing with the intention of local and distant tumor control, improving quality of life and prolongation of survival. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a) chemotherapy versus best supportive care or b) different chemotherapy regimes against each other, in metastatic esophageal carcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials--CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2004) MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004), EMBASE (1980 to February 2004) and Cancerlit. Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. The search was updated in February 2005 and February 2006. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care, or different chemotherapy regimes against each other in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (MYVH/EJK) extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted to obtain subgroup results of patients with metastatic esophageal carcinoma. MAIN RESULTS: Only two RCTs with a total of 42 participants compared chemotherapy with best supportive care for metastatic esophageal cancer. No survival benefit was shown for chemotherapy treatment in these RCTs. Five RCTs with a total of 1242 participants compared different chemotherapy regimes. Due to variation in patient population and chemotherapy regimes, it was not possible to perform a formal pooled analysis. There was no consistent benefit of any specific chemotherapy regimen. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for well designed, adequately powered, phase III trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Chemotherapy agents with promising response rates and tolerable toxicity are cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), paclitaxel and antracyclins. Future trials comparing palliative treatment modalities should assess quality of life with validated quality of life measures.
Authors: David H Ilson; David Kelsen; Manish Shah; Gary Schwartz; Douglas A Levine; Jeff Boyd; Marinela Capanu; Benjamin Miron; David Klimstra Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Juan W Valle; Anne Armstrong; Chris Newman; Valery Alakhov; Grzegorz Pietrzynski; Julie Brewer; Sue Campbell; Pippa Corrie; Eric K Rowinsky; Malcolm Ranson Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Vincent T Janmaat; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ate van der Gaast; Ron Hj Mathijssen; Marco J Bruno; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon Cw Spaander Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Peter S N van Rossum; Cai Xu; David V Fried; Lucas Goense; Laurence E Court; Steven H Lin Journal: Transl Cancer Res Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.241
Authors: P Teyton; J P Metges; A Atmani; V Jestin-Le Tallec; A Volant; D Visvikis; J P Bail; O Pradier; P Lozac'h; Catherine Cheze Le Rest Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 3.452