Literature DB >> 17054006

Changing attitudes toward endolumenal therapy.

J W Hazey1, B J Dunkin, W S Melvin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As with new laparoscopic techniques, the ability to convince surgeons and gastroenterologists to embrace endolumenal techniques and the additional training required to perform the new procedures will correlate with how rapidly endolumenal therapies are adopted. The authors measured their ability to change attitudes among surgeons, who may or may not perform endoscopy as a part of their practice, toward endolumenal therapies.
METHODS: As part of the endoluminal therapy postgraduate course presented at the annual Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 2005, experts presented current literature and data on new endolumenal techniques. The participants, primarily of surgeons, were polled electronically about a number of case scenarios before and after their presentation. Each scenario was relevant to the topic presented and chosen to reflect potentially controversial disease processes with traditional or endolumenal treatment options. The responses were collected in real time and displayed to course participants.
RESULTS: A panel of 10 experts presented data on a range of endolumenal therapies including endolumenal treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), endoscopic stenting, endoscopic treatments in bariatric surgery, intraoperative endoscopy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), mucosal ablation for Barrett's esophagus, intralumenal resection, translumenal endoscopic surgery, and how to educate surgeons in new endolumenal techniques. Demographic data showed that 83.6% of the participants performed endoscopy as part of their practice. A comparison with traditional surgical options showed a statistically significant positive attitude change (p < 0.05) toward adoption of most endolumenal techniques after expert presentation. Only EMR and TEM did not show a statistically significant change in the participants' willingness to adopt these techniques. There was no significant change in the attitudes of how best to train surgeons. After presentation of the training options, 76% of the respondents believed that these techniques should be taught in residency.
CONCLUSIONS: The education of surgeons in new endolumenal therapeutic techniques can have a significant impact in terms of changing practice attitudes and may accelerate adoption of new endoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17054006     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9001-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

1.  Problem-based learning: a case study in providing e-health education using the Internet.

Authors:  Jennifer G Tichon
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 2.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Evaluation of an online postgraduate education programme.

Authors:  David Cahill; Julian Cook; Andrew Sithers; John Edwards; Julian Kenkins
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.650

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Transoral surgery for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Sabrena F Noria; Dean J Mikami
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16

Review 2.  [The present and future status of "scarless" surgery].

Authors:  F Hagenmüller; M Immenroth; T Berg; K Bally; S Rasche
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Endoscopic water jets used to ablate Barrett's esophagus: preliminary results of a new technique.

Authors:  M Kroh; R Hall; S Udomsawaengsup; A Smith; L Yerian; B Chand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Reimbursement for new technologies: the GERD maze is not patient-friendly.

Authors:  Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-01-18

Review 5.  Advanced endoscopic technologies.

Authors:  Kevin M Reavis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The feasibility of delivering a duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (EndoBarrier) endoscopically with patients under conscious sedation.

Authors:  Parviez Koehestanie; Bark Betzel; Kemal Dogan; Frits Berends; Ignace Janssen; Edo Aarts; Marcel Groenen; Peter Wahab
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Micaela Piccoli; Piccoli Micaela; Ferdinando Agresta; Agresta Ferdinando; Vincenzo Trapani; Trapani Vincenzo; Casimiro Nigro; Nigro Casimiro; Vito Pende; Pende Vito; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Campanile Fabio Cesare; Nereo Vettoretto; Vettoretto Nereo; Enrico Belluco; Belluco Enrico; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Bianchi Pietro Paolo; Davide Cavaliere; Cavaliere Davide; Giuseppe Ferulano; Ferulano Giuseppe; Filippo La Torre; La Torre Filippo; Marco Maria Lirici; Lirici Marco Maria; Roberto Rea; Rea Roberto; Gianni Ricco; Ricco Gianni; Elena Orsenigo; Orsenigo Elena; Simona Barlera; Barlera Simona; Emanuele Lettieri; Lettieri Emanuele; Giovanni Maria Romano; Romano Giovanni Maria
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Indications and benefits of intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Martin Stašek; René Aujeský; Radek Vrba; Martin Loveček; Josef Chudáček; Petr Janda; Michal Gregořík; Katherine Vomáčková; Čestmír Neoral; Dušan Klos
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.